There is no way to do what you want afaik
You need to either:
  * use a single transaction from a single thread
  * use multiple threads and do manual compensation (which is manual rollback)

You can also use multiple threads and multiple transactions, but a
transaction rollback wil only rollback the transaction for its own
thread.

On 10/4/07, Arif Mohd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi gnodet,
>
>        Could you please answer my question as explained above.Ofcourse i
> also attached activemq with the transaction manager and rolling
> back,commiting of transactions are happening perfectly.
>
>       The flow is very simple once the message is posted in activemq these
> threads starts executing parallely if any one of thread fails all the
> processing of threads will be rolled back and even the message in activemq
> is rolled back.
>
>
> Arif Mohd wrote:
> >
> > But my business logic is all these processing logic(threads) are
> > independent, so i want to execute them parallely but if one business
> > operation fails none of them should succeed.
> >
> >      so as you can see in the code iam just calling session.persist()
> > method and not commiting to DB, once all the threads have completed their
> > work iam calling commit on transaction manager(here i want to make use of
> > transaction manager)  also all the DB operations are done in one thread.
> >
> >      Does it make sence? or if you have any better idea of doing
> > these(running parallely but atlast should be committed at one point)
> > please let me know.
> >
> >
> > gnodet wrote:
> >>
> >> As I already said, distributed transactions are transactions involving
> >> several resources that may be remote (a database, jms broker, etc...).
> >>  But such transactions must be used within a single thread.
> >> So what you are trying to do is certainly not permitted by both jta and
> >> spring.
> >>
> >> If you need the whole process to be transacted, the only choice is to
> >> have everything running sequentially.  And the opposite: if you want
> >> to work to be splitted across several threads (or even computers), you
> >> can not use a single transaction.
> >>
> >> If the processing time (apart from accessing the database) is length,
> >> you could use several threads for it, but all database access must be
> >> done from a single thread.
> >>
> >> On 9/25/07, Arif Mohd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>    Iam new to this jencks and even to hybernate. Just i want to know can
> >>> i
> >>> integrate jencks with hybernate. My requirement is there are 3 threads,
> >>> 2 of
> >>> them are hybernate session threads doing some DB operation and one more
> >>> thread is using ActiveMQ. I want to make use of jenks for maintaing
> >>> distributed transactions over these threads
> >>> --
> >>> View this message in context:
> >>> http://www.nabble.com/Does-jencks-canbe-integrated-with-hybernate--tf4514305.html#a12875825
> >>> Sent from the jencks - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> >>>
> >>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >> ------------------------
> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> >>
> >>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Does-jencks-canbe-integrated-with-hybernate--tf4514305.html#a13032903
> Sent from the jencks - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply via email to