The project is not dead per se.  This is just that the project has
fullfilled its purpose
and is no longer actively developped.
If there is a need for another release,  I'll do it.
So please, raise a JIRA and attach a patch, i'll review and apply it.

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Andrei Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it would be nice if you could open an issue for jencks and
>  attach the code there...
>  Maybe it will even be included in a next version...
>  Hmm... http://jira.goopen.org/jira/browse/JCA seems to be dead...
>  Well... kind of like this project...
>  Post it here then...
>  Thank you.
>
>
>
>  On 2/28/08, Jerry Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > I have solved my problem by inhertiting from the Geronimo work manager and
>  > doing exactly that. Do you want the code?
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
>  >
>  > > Well, the code seems ok to me, as the thread pools are given to the
>  > > work manager.
>  > > So they need to be created and shut down from the one that creates the
>  > > work manager.
>  > > In the jencks case, i'm not sure who does that (haven't looked yet),
>  > > but it should be easy
>  > > to fix, maybe by inheriting the geronimo work manager and overriding
>  > > doStop if needed.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Andrei Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > wrote:
>  > > >
>  > 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/components/txmanager/trunk/geronimo-connector/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/connector/work/GeronimoWorkManager.java?view=log
>  > > >
>  > > >  It seems that code was removed in rev 392847:
>  > > >  Make thread pools manageable and make our WorkManager use our thread
>  > pools
>  > > >   under the covers.
>  > > >
>  > 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/components/txmanager/trunk/geronimo-connector/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/connector/work/GeronimoWorkManager.java?r1=381272&r2=392847
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >  On 2/27/08, Jerry Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > >  > geronimo-connector-2.1 has the same problem (empty doStop method)
>  > > >  > unfortunately...
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  > I'm having difficulty finding any more info on geronimo-connector.
>  > It's even
>  > > >  > proving difficult to find its subversion repository or maybe its 
> just
>  > too
>  > > >  > late at night ;)
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > wrote:
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  > > Yeah, good idea.  Maybe a simple version bump would work ?
>  > > >  > > Have you tried that, or is there any api changes that we need to
>  > deal with
>  > > >  > ?
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Jerry Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > wrote:
>  > > >  > > > It looks like a more recent version of GeronimoWorkMnaager shuts
>  > down
>  > > >  > its
>  > > >  > > > thread pools in the doStop method - see here:
>  > > >  > > >
>  > > >  >
>  > 
> http://www.docjar.com/html/api/org/apache/geronimo/connector/work/GeronimoWorkManager.java.html
>  > > >  > > >
>  > > >  > > > Are there any plans to upgrade the the version of
>  > geronimo-connector
>  > > >  > that
>  > > >  > > > Jencks 2.1 depends on? I'm more than happy to assist if 
> needed...
>  > > >  > > >
>  > > >  > > > Cheers, Jerry
>  > > >  > > >
>  > > >  > > >
>  > > >  > > >
>  > > >  > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 8:55 PM, JerryShea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > wrote:
>  > > >  > > >
>  > > >  > > > >
>  > > >  > > > > Hi,
>  > > >  > > > >
>  > > >  > > > > I've cut and pasted the jencks JCA config from
>  > > >  > > > > http://jencks.org/Message+Driven+POJOs and if
>  > I use
>  > > >  > it like this:
>  > > >  > > > >        AbstractApplicationContext ctx = new
>  > > >  > > > ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(new
>  > > >  > > > > String[] {
>  > > >  > > > >                "/spring-jencks.xml",
>  > > >  > > > >        });
>  > > >  > > > >        Thread.sleep(3000);
>  > > >  > > > >        ctx.destroy();
>  > > >  > > > >
>  > > >  > > > > after the spring application context has been created, a 
> number
>  > of
>  > > >  > threads
>  > > >  > > > > are started up (JCAContainer.afterPropertiesSet creates a
>  > Geronimo
>  > > >  > work
>  > > >  > > > > manager which in turn creates a thread pool).
>  > > >  > > > >
>  > > >  > > > > When ctx.destroy is called, JCAContainer.destroy gets called
>  > which in
>  > > >  > turn
>  > > >  > > > > calls geronimoWorkManager.doStop() which does... nothing!
>  > > >  > > > >
>  > > >  > > > > Shouldn't something be shutting down the thread pool? The
>  > threads that
>  > > >  > are
>  > > >  > > > > created remain alive and prevent my application from closing
>  > down.
>  > > >  > > > >
>  > > >  > > > > Thx, Jerry
>  > > >  > > > >
>  > > >  > > > > --
>  > > >  > > > > View this message in context:
>  > > >  > > >
>  > > >  >
>  > 
> http://www.nabble.com/Jencks-Message-driven-POJOS-threads-left-running-after-ctx.destroy-tp15709825p15709825.html
>  > > >  > > > > Sent from the jencks - user mailing list archive at 
> Nabble.com.
>  > > >  > > > >
>  > > >  > > > >
>  > > >  > > > >
>  > > >  >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > > >  > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>  > > >  > > > >
>  > > >  > > > >    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>  > > >  > > > >
>  > > >  > > > >
>  > > >  > > > >
>  > > >  > > >
>  > > >  > > >
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  > > --
>  > > >  > > Cheers,
>  > > >  > > Guillaume Nodet
>  > > >  > > ------------------------
>  > > >  > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > > >  > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  > >    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  > >
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > > >  To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>  > > >
>  > > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > --
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Cheers,
>  > > Guillaume Nodet
>  > > ------------------------
>  > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>  > >
>  > >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>  > >
>  > >    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to