These settings were introduced in 2.6. To face cpu impact on Time computing.
In 2.4 thé settings i made you set are hère by défault afaik as nano computing was not yet available . Regards Philippe On Wednesday, February 15, 2012, Robin D. Wilson <rwils...@gmail.com> wrote: > On JMeter 2.6, setting the settings you recommended fixed the problem: > > - sampleresult.useNanoTime=false > - sampleresult.nanoThreadSleep=0 > > But it doesn't do anything for JMeter 2.4. Needless to say, I have a bunch of re-benchmarking to do... > > I can file a ticket - but I am not sure that it will provide much value, since it is clear that the above settings fix the problem. > > -- > Robin D. Wilson > Sr. Director of Web Development > KingsIsle Entertainment, Inc. > VOICE: 512-777-1861 > www.KingsIsle.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Philippe Mouawad [mailto:philippe.moua...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 3:52 PM > To: JMeter Users List > Subject: Re: Average times are confusing me... > > Hello, > I think you should submit your Test as a bug just for us to check what > could explain this. > I made many tests on WinXP and never faced this issue so I am not convinced > it's the real explanation although you reproduced it. > > Can you also make a test by setting this in jmeter.properties: > > > - sampleresult.useNanoTime=false > - sampleresult.nanoThreadSleep=0 > > > Thanks > Regards > Philippe > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Robin D. Wilson <rwils...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> FYI, I have confirmed that my test case only fails on 'WinXP'. When I run >> the exact same test on Win7 (x64), it works fine. >> >> The sad thing is, I've been benchmarking my systems using WinXP for over a >> year ... sigh. >> >> So now I find out that all my benchmark numbers are essentially bogus. >> >> -- >> Robin D. Wilson >> Sr. Director of Web Development >> KingsIsle Entertainment, Inc. >> VOICE: 512-777-1861 >> www.KingsIsle.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Philippe Mouawad [mailto:philippe.moua...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 2:13 PM >> To: JMeter Users List >> Subject: Re: Average times are confusing me... >> >> Mac OSX 10.6.8. >> >> I suggest you open an issue with your attached test plan (exactly the one >> that has the issue). >> >> Regards >> Philippe >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Robin D. Wilson <rwils...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Just out of curiosity - what type of OS was your JMeter GUI running on? >> > I've been running my tests on Windows XP. >> > >> > -- >> > Robin D. Wilson >> > Sr. Director of Web Development >> > KingsIsle Entertainment, Inc. >> > VOICE: 512-777-1861 >> > www.KingsIsle.com >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Philippe Mouawad [mailto:philippe.moua...@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 7:41 AM >> > To: JMeter Users List >> > Subject: Re: Average times are confusing me... >> > >> > Hello, >> > I have just made the same test with a JSP (doing a Thread.sleep(2000) => >> > 2s) behind a Tomcat 6 with JMeter 2.6 >> > >> > I put 100 threads that loop 100 times in GUI mode (one JMETER): >> > All results shown in Aggregate report are around 2s . >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > sampler_label,aggregate_report_count,average,aggregate_report_median,aggregate_report_90%_line,aggregate_report_min,aggregate_report >> > >> > >> _max,aggregate_report_error%,aggregate_report_rate,aggregate_report_bandwidth >> > HTTP >> > >> > >> Request,10000,2006,2004,2012,2001,2195,0.0,49.5793194742609,1224.082013722936 >> > >> TOTAL,10000,2006,2004,2012,2001,2195,0.0,49.5793194742609,1224.082013722936 >> > >> > >> > Summary listener shows this: >> > 2012/02/10 14:36:00 INFO - jmeter.reporters.Summariser: Generate Summary >> > Results + 2655 in 54,8s = 48,4/s Avg: 2010 Min: 2001 Max: 2195 >> > Err: 0 (0,00%) >> > 2012/02/10 14:38:26 INFO - jmeter.reporters.Summariser: Generate Summary >> > Results + 7345 in 148,9s = 49,3/s Avg: 2005 Min: 2001 Max: 2088 >> > Err: 0 (0,00%) >> > 2012/02/10 14:38:26 INFO - jmeter.reporters.Summariser: Generate Summary >> > Results = 10000 in 201,7s = 49,6/s Avg: 2006 Min: 2001 Max: 2195 >> > Err: 0 (0,00%) >> > >> > So as you can see, nothing abnormal . >> > >> > JSP Code: >> > >> > <%@ page contentType="text/html; charset=UTF-8" %> >> > <html> >> > <body> >> > <% >> > Thread.sleep(2000); >> > %> >> > <!-- GENERATE around 25Ko page --> >> > <%=org.apache.commons.lang.RandomStringUtils.random(25000, >> > "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz01234567890")%> >> > <p>Test</p> >> > </body> >> > </html> -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
