See attached. Don't have a Windows machine available but run the ant script in schematic.cmd directly, hope it came out OK.
-- Best Regards Kostas Papadopoulos K.E MethodosIT Ltd Tel: +357 22463610 Fax: +357 22515197 Website: http://www.methodosit.com.cy On Tue 09 Apr 2013 09:57:56 Philippe Mouawad wrote: > Are you using TransactionController ? > > Would it be possible for you to give an overview of your Test Plan using > jmeter_home/extras/schematic.cmd utility ? > > Thanks > Regards > Philippe > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Kostas Papadopoulos < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > Alternatively, you could re-benchmark after each change to obtain a > > > new baseline and then use comparative adjustments as required. > > > > That's what I meant. > > > > Tests/results can be surprisingly sensitive some times. I also found out > > that > > removing a "Response Assertion" from the test plan got me different > > results. > > Also disabling a test branch vs setting it to zero loops using a > > -Jparameter > > will give different results. > > > > > You wouldn't really want to be stuck on the same version forever, > > > would you? > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Kostas Papadopoulos [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 9 April 2013 4:33 PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Cc: Adrian Speteanu > > > > Subject: Re: GUI getting slower? > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > After some more testing, I found this is an issue (at least for me) > > > > only > > > > > > when throughput is high, of the order of 4000 transactions per sec > > > > on 25 threads. I don't think it is worth the time to investigate > > > > further. > > > > > > > > The lesson for me is that to do comparative performance testing you > > > > shouldn't change anything from your baseline, including JMeter > > > > versions. > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards > > > > > > > > Kostas Papadopoulos > > > > > > > > K.E MethodosIT Ltd > > > > > > > > Tel: +357 22463610 > > > > Fax: +357 22515197 > > > > Website: http://www.methodosit.com.cy > > > > > > > > On Thu 04 Apr 2013 17:20:06 Adrian Speteanu wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are willing to contribute with tests & results of your own, > > > > > or if you find a scenario that doesn't work, its safe to say that > > > > > everyone in the list is interested in reading about it. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kostas Papadopoulos < > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Philippe, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the response. We have already changed our test > > > > > > practice to non-GUI testing so it is not an issue for us. But > > > > > > if anyone > > > > needs > > > > > > > > to investigate this further I'm willing to help. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > Kostas Papadopoulos > > > > > > > > > > > > K.E MethodosIT Ltd > > > > > > > > > > > > Tel: +357 22463610 > > > > > > Fax: +357 22515197 > > > > > > Website: http://www.methodosit.com.cy > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed 03 Apr 2013 15:46:12 Philippe Mouawad wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > @Kostas, there is a clear recommandation to do test in NON GUI > > > > > > > mode. http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/best-practices.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since 2.5 there has been a lot of fixes on somes GUI issues > > > > > > > related to synchronization problems, they may have incurred > > > > > > > some performance degradations although I didn't notice them > > > > > > > on the few > > > > > > > > tests I did. > > > > > > > > > > > There has been a Bugzilla opened a while ago and tests didn't > > > > show > > > > > > > > > it clearly > > > > > > > > > > > > > > See: > > > > > > > - http://jmeter.apache.org/changes.html > > > > > > > - http://jmeter.apache.org/changes_history.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Kirk, > > > > > > > Since 2.5 there has been quite a lot improvements on Memory > > > > > > > and Performances. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Among this: > > > > > > > - fixes on memory leaks > > > > > > > - fixes on memory usage by Regexp Extractor which consumed > > > > > > > the double of a response size > > > > > > > - fixes in core > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In 2.9, we introduced a performance improvement that may have > > > > > > > increased usage of memory which in summary caches the response > > > > > > > so that it is not converted/parsed as many times as there are > > > > > > > post processors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My tests showed an important performance gain if > > > > > > > post-processors were > > > > > > > > > > > > used > > > > > > > > > > > > > which in my opinion is the majority of cases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So at first sight I doubt there is performance degradation > > > > between > > > > > > > > > 2.5 > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.9 but I may be wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don' t hesitate to open an issue with a sample test plan and > > > > > > > as many informations as you have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Philippe M. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Kirk Pepperdine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > I've noted some significant differences in performance which > > > > > > > > I'll be investigating over the next few days. The first > > > > > > > > thing I've noted is a significant increase in memory > > > > > > > > requirements. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Kirk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2013-04-03, at 4:48 AM, Kostas Papadopoulos > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > We have been using JMeter version 2.5 to do some > > > > > > > > > performance testing. I recently installed JMeter version > > > > > > > > > 2.9 and I found that the test results > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the same tests are very different when using the GUI. In > > > > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > > > instance, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same test gives throughput 4500/sec with version 2.5 and > > > > > > > > > 3800/sec > > > > > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.9. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Running non-gui on both versions gives comparable results > > > > > > > > > (within > > > > > > > > > > > > 2%). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > running these tests on the same exact environment for both > > > > > > > > > version (same machines, application to be tested, java > > > > > > > > > version, database, data, etc.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this to be expected? Is the recommended practise to run > > > > > > > > > only non-gui? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is it something to be looked at more carefully? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please excuse me if this has this been addressed before. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kostas Papadopoulos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > K.E MethodosIT Ltd > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tel: +357 22463610 > > > > > > > > > Fax: +357 22515197 > > > > > > > > > Website: http://www.methodosit.com.cy > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > > > > --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
