Hi I would argue that many users will benefit from adding a metric to calculate 
the sent bytes for PUT and POST. 
I was wondering can someone create a bug for this (or point me to how to create 
one? I have not created a jmeter bug before). 
Is there anytime line for this functionality?
thanks
Ahmad 

> Subject: Re: HTTP PUT bytes output does NOT include the uploaded file size
> To: [email protected]
> From: [email protected]
> Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 21:36:34 +0200
> 
> HI ,
> 
> thumbs up for a new metric measuring output bytes.
> It should not break any current report, but  I have this need very often.
> It is a common requirement for many application types like document 
> management.
> Also, it is not so simple to forecast the output size, when considering 
> cookies, headers, content compression, etc.
> 
> Regards
> Sergio
> 
> Il 01/10/2016 14.57, Philippe Mouawad ha scritto:
> > Hello,
> > See discussion "Add a new metric : sent bytes", there have been some
> > feedback on this proposal.
> >
> > Even if it's some work, I believe it should be here.
> > I am often asked to provide the outgoing traffic from JMeter.
> > To provide it I have to rely on 3rd party tools.
> > It would be nice to have it as we currently have a report that graphs
> > incoming bytes.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:52 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 1 October 2016 at 08:35, Ivan Rancati <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> I would suggest:
> >>>
> >>> write a sampler in Java that does the http put, then you can access the
> >>> Response object and set the size to a value you specify.
> >>> I think it would also work with the scripting samples (like Beanshell,
> >>> Javascript)
> >>>
> >>> I personally don't think there is anything to fix, as all samplers return
> >>> the size of the response, and it would be confusing to have a model where
> >>> the size is sometimes the request, sometimes the response, or a mix of
> >> the
> >>> two. I'm a JMeter user, not a developer, so that's just my opinion, maybe
> >>> I'm missing something obvious
> >> You have put it very well.
> >> JMeter measures the server response size.
> >>
> >> I suppose there could be an option to include the request size, but
> >> that would be a fair amount of work to add.
> >> It's obviously not a huge need, otherwise there would have been more
> >> requests to add it (and maybe a patch or two).
> >>
> >> Note that the size of file uploads will generally be known by the
> >> tester, so can be allowed for if necessary.
> >> Whereas the server response size is not known until the request completes.
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Ahmad A <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi IvanThank you for your prompt response.
> >>>> The content-length that is being returned with the PUT request is 
> >>>> actually
> >>>> 0
> >>>> Content-Length: 0
> >>>> So I am guessing Jmeter is calculating the response size of all the
> >>>> headers and text returned which is consistent with the 464 bytes recorded
> >>>> for all object PUTs. This calculation of bytes for PUT is not correct 
> >>>> since
> >>>> the measurement needs to be the amount of data sent (PUT, POST) not
> >>>> received (GET).
> >>>> Is it possible to get this fixed??
> >>>> thanks
> >>>> Ahmad
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> From: [email protected]
> >>>>> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 20:39:46 +0200
> >>>>> Subject: Re: HTTP PUT bytes output does NOT include the uploaded 
> >>>>> filesize
> >>>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would imagine JMeter returns the size of the http response, not the
> >>>> size
> >>>>> of the uploaded data.
> >>>>> What does the Content-Length header return for your request?
> >>>>> I would imagine it's a constant number, regardless of how many bytes
> >> you
> >>>> PUT
> >>>>> Example with wget, it's similar with curl
> >>>>> wget -S -O /dev/null --method=PUT
> >>>>> --body-data="123456789012345678901234567890
> >>>> 123456789012345678901234567890"
> >>>>> http://...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> best regards
> >>>>> Ivan
> >>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Ing. Sergio Boso
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
                                          

Reply via email to