thanks. the command was - " mvn dependency:tree " and the output included all the JARS I listed as dependencies of JMeter.
Though you have mentioned "javax.measure:jsr-275:jar:0.9.3" and "org.tukaani:xz:jar:1.5 " as not part of JMeter, the Maven commands displays it as part of JMeter. I didn't want to copy and paste the dependency tree here, but if you require, I can do that. On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Philippe Mouawad < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > What did you run exactly ? > > Find some answers below. > Regards > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Jeeva Muthukrishnan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello All: > > > > I am developing a web-server application that exposes some APIs for > > receiving and storing customer information from an IPhone Client > > Application. > > > > I have been looking at using JMeter for load testing the web-server > > application hosted in AWS. > > > > > > JMeter is licensed under Apache 2.0 license, and that's good. However, I > > ran "mvn dependency:tree " command to look at all Jars included by > JMeter, > > and it looks like some of them use more restrictive licenses, or there is > > no explicit information about commercial use. > > > > > > *Jars in doubt:* > > > > javax.measure:jsr-275:jar:0.9.3 -> [ https://kenai.com/projects/jsr-275 > ] > > <https://kenai.com/projects/jsr-275> > > > > This is not a dependency of JMeter. > > > > > > xmlpull:xmlpull:jar:1.1.3.1 -> [ http://www.xmlpull.org ] ===> no > > mention > > of commercial use > > > > This api is in public domain > http://www.xmlpull.org/v1/download/unpacked/LICENSE.txt > > See /licenses/bin/xmlpull-1.1.3.1.txt > > > > > org.beanshell:bsh:jar:2.0b5 -> [http://www.beanshell.org/] ==> > LGPL-3.0 > > > JMeter uses SPL version which allows commercial use. > See /licenses/bin/beanshell-2.0b5.txt > > > > > com.google.code.findbugs:annotations:2.0.3 ==> LGPL-3.0 > > > Only used in development. > Not a dependency of JMeter. > > > > > org.tukaani:xz:jar:1.5 ==> license not known > > > > Not a JMeter dependency > > > > > > > > > > > *Question:* > > > > Does Apache 2.0 license, supersede all JARs included as transitive > > dependencies? Or, should I be considering each license separately ? > > > > thanks > > Jawahar > > > > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. >
