I completely agree with Adrain. I have been using JMeter since ages and Gatling 
too based on my requirement I switches in between of two. In my opinion, JMeter 
is far better than the Gatling. Based on my experience, gatling community is 
neither a quick nor vibrant. 

Thanks,
Rushabh

-----Original Message-----
From: Prateek Dua <[email protected]> 
Sent: 04 February 2020 14:30
To: JMeter Users List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Gatling Vs Jmeter

Agreed with Adrain. We too did POC of gatling but considering the points 
mentioned by Adrian ( scripting in scala when the scenarios get more
complex) , We moved to Jmeter.

Thanks,
Prateek

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 2:22 PM Adrian Speteanu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> While I'm not necessarily happy with the methodology used for 
> comparison, the point remains that there aren't significant 
> differences when it comes to the technical capabilities. So, in the 
> end, it should come down to the implementation team's preferences. Are 
> they going to feel more comfortable scripting in scala when the 
> scenarios get more complex? Or do they prefer using the GUI of JMeter?
>
> Implementing scenarios would be simpler in JMeter in my view, but it 
> would be easier to maintain scripts over time if they were coded (in 
> any language).
>
> -A
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:14 AM Soumya Nayak <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > I came across a link about Gatling Vs JMeter .
> >
> > https://dzone.com/articles/gatling-vs-jmeter
> >
> > From the above link I could see some of the advantages of Gatling 
> > over JMeter with respect to memory and CPU usage.
> >
> > So anybody having more details can help me out this to create a line 
> > of difference to plan for the specific tool usage better.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Soumya
> >
> >
> >
> >
> **********************************************************************
> ********************
> > This message may contain confidential or proprietary information 
> > intended only for the use of the
> > addressee(s) named above or may contain information that is legally 
> > privileged. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person 
> > responsible for delivering it
> to
> > the intended addressee,
> > you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing or 
> > copying this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
> > this message by mistake, please immediately notify us by replying to 
> > the message and delete the original message and any copies 
> > immediately thereafter.
> >
> > If you received this email as a commercial message and would like to 
> > opt out of future commercial messages, please let us know and we 
> > will remove you from our distribution list.
> >
> > Thank you.~
> >
> >
> **********************************************************************
> ********************
> > FAFLD
> >
>

-- 


::DISCLAIMER::


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain 
information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under 
applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or 
the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this 
e-mail and all attachments from your system.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to