Am 19.08.20 um 12:34 schrieb Barcode S K:
> I was using the "system" look and feel, and still had the problem. Maybe
> one of the new builds will help.
>
> Could you help me figure out why there is this additional overhead when I
> run with think time? TTL is now 60 seconds and my runs are less than 60
> seconds long. The overhead has reduced by 5 ms (currently at 6 ms), but it
> is still there. What could be the reason? I run exactly the same thing with
> exactly the same number of VUs on the very same system, just with and
> without think time.

There can be a lot of reasons (meaning I don't know :)), but if you have
a minimal test plan that shows that behaviour, we could look into it.

Felix

>
> -SK
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:38 PM Felix Schumacher <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Am 19.08.20 um 09:33 schrieb Barcode S K:
>>> Thank you, Felix. This should help.
>>>
>>> I tried running the same tests through JMeter 5.3. It is true- the
>>> connections were not reopened. That's a great change!
>>> I believe there is still a problem, though. I earlier had response times
>> of
>>> 31 ms without think, and 42 ms with think. Now it's 31 and 37, and it is
>>> consistent. An improvement- but the question still remains why the extra
>> 6
>>> ms. The impact becomes more pronounced when there is high latency. In the
>>> tests that I am referencing here, I have had to deal with just 40-45
>>> microseconds of latency (everything is on the same host).
>> A minimal test plan to reproduce such issues is always good to have.
>>>
>>> I have had some problems with JMeter 5.3 because of which I went back to
>>> 5.2. I will start a different thread for this. I will just give you an
>> idea
>>> of what I see every time a load test ends with 5.3.
>>>
>>> Tidying up ...    @ Wed Aug 19 12:49:45 IST 2020 (1597821585946)
>>> ... end of run
>>> The JVM should have exited but did not.
>>> The following non-daemon threads are still running (DestroyJavaVM is OK):
>>> Thread[DestroyJavaVM,5,main], stackTrace:
>>> Thread[AWT-EventQueue-0,6,main], stackTrace:sun.misc.Unsafe#park
>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport#park at line:175
>>>
>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject#await
>>> at line:2039
>>> java.awt.EventQueue#getNextEvent at line:554
>>> java.awt.EventDispatchThread#pumpOneEventForFilters at line:187
>>> java.awt.EventDispatchThread#pumpEventsForFilter at line:116
>>> java.awt.EventDispatchThread#pumpEventsForHierarchy at line:105
>>> java.awt.EventDispatchThread#pumpEvents at line:101
>>> java.awt.EventDispatchThread#pumpEvents at line:93
>>> java.awt.EventDispatchThread#run at line:82
>>>
>>> Thread[AWT-Shutdown,5,system], stackTrace:java.lang.Object#wait
>>> sun.awt.AWTAutoShutdown#run at line:314
>>> java.lang.Thread#run at line:748
>> We had some problems with the new default LAF, which might lead to
>> unexpected problems in GUI Mode (affects 5.3). You can try to run a
>> nightly build (where the bugs should be fixed) or switch to a
>> non-darklaf mode.
>>
>> Felix
>>
>>> ^C
>>>
>>> This error has appeared on all (three) Linux VMs (Oracle Linux) that I've
>>> tried, plus on my Windows system that had a previous installation of
>>> JMeter. I did not encounter this error while running it on another
>> Windows
>>> server that had never had JMeter installed on it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 10:38 PM Felix Schumacher <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am 18.08.20 um 18:18 schrieb Barcode S K:
>>>>>  Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I recently recorded my application with JMeter.
>>>> Which version of JMeter are you using?
>>>>
>>>>>    - The application is SSL-enabled.
>>>>>    - Application launch, login, and a screen launch are inside a
>>>> Once-Only
>>>>>    Controller.
>>>>>    - The actual *transaction*- which involves just one POST request- is
>>>> in
>>>>>    a separate transaction controller.
>>>>>    - Sleep time of 1 second is configured.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been running 1 VU tests, and I have observed that (for the
>>>>> *transaction* alone):
>>>>>
>>>>>    1. While running with think time, average response time is about 42
>>>> ms.
>>>>>    2. While running without think time, average response time is 31 ms.
>>>>>
>>>>> To eliminate latency and excess load, I am running only 1 VU tests for
>>>>> 30-60 seconds on the same machine that hosts the application. I have
>>>>> observed (via netstat) that JMeter opens a new connection every 2-3
>>>> seconds
>>>>> and I believe the overhead of new handshakes plus the SSL handshake
>> (and
>>>>> other connection-related processing) is the reason between this
>>>> difference.
>>>>
>>>> We changed the default for httpclient4.time_to_live to 60000. If you are
>>>> not using the newest version (which is 5.3 or you can try a nightly
>>>> build), make sure, that you have not overwritten that setting locally.
>>>>
>>>> The change was tracked with
>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64289.
>>>>
>>>> Hope this helps
>>>>
>>>>  Felix
>>>>
>>>>> I have not seen this behavior with other tools like NeoLoad and OATS.
>> In
>>>>> those tools, when an application that has sessions is run in a load
>> test,
>>>>> there is only one socket (connection) per virtual client and it remains
>>>>> open throughout the run.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any way to ensure that JMeter does not open new sockets for
>> new
>>>>> requests in the middle of the run like this? Keep-alive is enabled for
>>>> HTTP
>>>>> requests.
>>>>>
>>>>> -SK
>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to