Wrap your *|${requestBody}|* into __eval() function
<https://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/functions.html#__eval>, it will
allow JMeter to resolve JMeter Functions and Variables
<https://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/functions.html> which are present
as "placeholders" in the CSV file to their respective values.
|*${__eval(${requestBody})}* |
Also if you consider scripting to accomplish your requirements be
informed that starting from JMeter 3.1 it's recommended to use JSR223
Test Elements and Groovy language
<https://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/best-practices.html#bsh_scripting>.
More information: Apache Groovy: What Is Groovy Used For?
<https://www.blazemeter.com/blog/apache-groovy>
On 7/26/2022 6:52 AM, ohaya wrote:
I was able to get this woring by using a Beanshell pre-processor and some
Java code that does var.get() and then Java String replaceall() and then
var.put().
On Monday, July 25, 2022, 11:29:41 PM EDT, ohaya<[email protected]> wrote:
I tried using __evalVar:
https://am.net/lib/tools/NetworkManagement/apache-jmeter-2.8/printable_docs/usermanual/functions.html
where I had the following in the string from the CSV Data
Config-element-requestBodies:
<Request ...>{name=${subjectDn}+...
But it looks like the __evalVar is NOT replacing the ${subjectDn} variable with
the value from the CSV Data Config-element-subject: variables :(...
Jim
On Monday, July 25, 2022, 10:55:10 PM EDT, ohaya<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
In my JMeter test plan, I have two CSV Data Config elements.
- CSV Data Config-element-requestBodies: variables: requestBody
- CSV Data Config-element-subject: variables: subjectDn
The requestBody variable contains an XML request, with a placeholder string and
I want to replace that placeholder with the contents of the subjectDn variable,
and then use the modified requestBody variable in the HTTP Request element. In
other words:
1) Replace the placeholder string in the ${requestBody} with the value in the
${subjectDn}, then
2) Use the ${requestBody} in the HTTP Request
How can I do that? What is the easiest/least overhead way of doing that?
Thanks,
Jim
