Hi, just to make these things start moving,
* regarding moving to github as primary repo: infra needs a link to a formal [VOTE] thread, so I'll begin one in a minute * regarding committership, the examples provided weren't too accurate ** commons grants commit right to every asf committer on sandbox components (https://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette) ** subversion has the concept of partial committers ( https://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/roles.html#partial-commit-access), and also welcomes any asf committer to commit obvious fixes and patches, as long as the patches have a +1 from a committer ( https://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/roles.html#guest-commiter ) ** not asf related, but Jenkins does something similar ( https://jenkins.io/project/governance/#lower-barrier-of-entry): "by not requiring new contributors to “prove themselves” before they are admitted to the committership. Instead, we assume they are good until proven otherwise" ** my take on this would be something similar to the jenkins model, but I'd really appreciate first commits as PRs, for review.. At least that's what I would do, but not sure if we should enforce this or just see how it unfolds (given that we don't have much activity).. I suppose we would probably also need a formal vote for this, but I'd like to ask what do other people think about this before starting the vote * regarding release trains (aka release every four months), as we have Board reports on months 01, 04, 07 and 10, how about releasing on 02, 05, 08 and 11 (starting next 02)? br, juan pablo On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Dave Koelmeyer < dave.koelme...@davekoelmeyer.co.nz> wrote: > > On 10/11/17 09:57, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > > * Release at least every four months. Master is deliverable, and it's > been > > getting small fixes and updates every now and then so why not release > every > > (let's say) 4 months? They would be minor releases, but they still would > be > > releases, which would make JSPWiki a little better for end-users so, > again, > > why not? There could be exceptions if needed (i.e. master broken or no > code > > pushed since last release), but I think it would be a good thing(tm) > Hi Juan Pablo > > Establishing regular releases would be fantastic. It would also be good > source material for public-facing marketing material, and help set a > clear message that the project is moving forward. > > Cheers, > Dave > > -- > Dave Koelmeyer > http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz > GPG Key ID: 0x238BFF87 > >
