Hi JB, Robert sounds like a reasonable User/Role feature for Karaf, would be interesting to see what roles we have here, a full accessible admin, a user level, do we need more distinct levels, like for example features, web, that correspond to the "std." feature sets we have?
@Robert could you open a Jira issue for that feature request :) regards, Achim 2011/11/2 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > Hi Robert, > > it's not possible for now but it's a good idea. We have something similar > in Apache Kalumet (called AccessList). > > It's a good new feature for Karaf 3.0. > > Regards > JB > > > On 11/02/2011 04:58 PM, rrsavage wrote: > >> Really what I'm after is a two level access system. An "admin" level that >> has full access to all commands, scripting, introspection, etc. And a >> "user" level of access that perhaps only provides access to a limited >> number >> of command. Additionally "user" level access would disallow scripting and >> introspection capabilities. Is this a reasonable approach and is it even >> possible? >> >> Thanks, Robert >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.** >> com/shell-commands-user-roles-**tp3474148p3474241.html<http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/shell-commands-user-roles-tp3474148p3474241.html> >> Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- -- *Achim Nierbeck* Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
