Perfect,

/Bengt

2011/11/15 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>

> Hi guys,
>
> I updated the wrapper in Karaf 2.2.4 to use 64 bits on Linux.
>
> I'm gonna take a look on that one.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 11/14/2011 04:27 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> thanx for giving this hint, I'll see if we can also use it.
>> I opened a issue for this to keep track of it:
>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/KARAF-1010<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1010>
>>
>> Regards, Achim
>>
>> 2011/11/14 Dan Tran <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>
>>
>>    May be this can help
>>
>>    http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.**com/Looking-for-free-wrapper-**
>> windows-x86-64-exe-version-3-**2-3-td4851520.html<http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Looking-for-free-wrapper-windows-x86-64-exe-version-3-2-3-td4851520.html>
>>
>>    Karaf may be able to   add the missing win 64 wrapper to it's
>>    distribution?
>>
>>    -d
>>
>>
>>    On Monday, November 14, 2011, Achim Nierbeck
>>    <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:bcanhome@googlemail.**com<[email protected]>>>
>> wrote:
>>     > AFAIR there used to be a "dual-licensed" version available, which
>>    isn't anymore and the last version of those dual-licensed is used.
>>     > Actually for Linux I think the 64bit was still available, but I'm
>>    not certain it is for windows.
>>     > So right now to find the version used, you might either consult
>>    the karaf jira or try to find it at the wrapper site :)
>>     > Regards, Achim
>>     >
>>     > 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]
>>    <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>
>>     >>
>>     >> Achim,
>>     >> I guess that answers my question whether Apache is compatible
>>    with GPL or not and the answer then is no.
>>     >> The 32 bit versions are licensed the same way as the 64 bit
>>    versions. How do we know that the wrapper bundled with Karaf is not
>>    GPL today? What version is it?
>>     >> /Bengt
>>     >>
>>     >> 2011/11/14 Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]
>>    <mailto:bcanhome@googlemail.**com <[email protected]>>>
>>
>>     >>>
>>     >>> Hi Bengt,
>>     >>> this strongly depends if the corresponding 64 bit service
>>    wrapper is available at a ASF friendly license.
>>     >>> AFAIR the newer versions of the service wrapper libraries are
>>    not Apache License 2 friendly and therefore can not be used.
>>     >>> You still might just use another version of the wrapper by
>>    installing/upgrading it yourself :)
>>     >>> Regards, Achim
>>     >>>
>>     >>> 2011/11/14 Bengt Rodehav <[email protected]
>>    <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>> I recently tried to run Karaf (as a Windows service) on 64 bit
>>    java (on Windows Server 2008). This does not seem to work properly.
>>    You get a serious warning in wrapper's log file that you're trying
>>    to run the 32 bit Wrapper on 64 bit java.
>>     >>>> I looked at 
>> http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.**com<http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com>and it 
>> seems
>>    like they do provide 64 bit versions as well. I think it would be
>>    nice if Karaf could provide both the 32 bit and the 64 bit version
>>    out-of-the box. Some logic to determine which one to install is of
>>    course required. Perhaps it could be separate features - one for the
>>    32 bit wrapper and one for the 64 bit wrapper.
>>     >>>> It's becoming very common to use 64 bit java now so I think
>>    this is important.
>>     >>>> I assume that Karaf is using the community version of the
>>    Tanuki wrapper. In that case it uses a GPL license. Is this really
>>    compatible with Apache's license? What happens if we bundle Karaf
>>    (and the Tanuki wrapper) with our applications? Does that require us
>>    to freely distribute our source code?
>>     >>>> /Benke
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>
>>     >>>
>>     >>>
>>     >>> --
>>     >>> *Achim Nierbeck*
>>     >>>
>>     >>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>     >>> OPS4J Pax Web 
>> <http://wiki.ops4j.org/**display/paxweb/Pax+Web/<http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>> >
>>    Committer & Project Lead
>>     >>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/**>
>>     >>
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > --
>>     > *Achim Nierbeck*
>>     >
>>     > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>     > OPS4J Pax Web 
>> <http://wiki.ops4j.org/**display/paxweb/Pax+Web/<http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>> >
>>    Committer & Project Lead
>>     > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/**>
>>     >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Achim Nierbeck*
>>
>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> OPS4J Pax Web 
>> <http://wiki.ops4j.org/**display/paxweb/Pax+Web/<http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>>
>> Committer
>> & Project Lead
>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/**>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [email protected]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Reply via email to