Correct, GPL and LGPL is category X license. However, as we don't
"embed" it in the distribution, it's allowed.
Anyway, I don't think that the dependency is required, I will remove it
if it's really the case.
Regards
JB
On 02/03/2013 07:52 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
My bad it is from http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net
I thought Apache policy does allow direct usage of LGPL lib?
Thanks
-D
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/branches/karaf-2.3.x/NOTICE
mentions about LGPL in summary section. which artifact is that?
Thanks
-D
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
