Using start levels isn't sufficient? But what is the reason for wanting/needing the dependency? Understanding the root issue may help identify a better solution.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Matthieu Vincent <mvincent...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I'd like to know which is the better way to have some dependency between > 2 bundles so that a bundle will not start before its dependency is in an > active state ? > > Thanks for answers > Mat >
