Karaf 4.0.4 brought me 4.2.4 of pax-web.
Is it safe to stick 4.2.5 in there?
I'm making assumptions about the meaning of the following, but, in general,
it seems wrong to get this much traffic for a simple 404 on static content.
jvm 1 | 2016-03-16 08:08:39,183 | WARN | tp1085327538-940 | Response
| 217 - org.eclipse.jetty.util - 9.2.14.v20151106 |
Committed before 404 null
jvm 1 | 2016-03-16 08:08:39,184 | WARN | tp1085327538-940 |
ServletHandler | 217 - org.eclipse.jetty.util -
9.2.14.v20151106 | /doc/index.html
jvm 1 | java.lang.IllegalStateException: Committed
jvm 1 | at
org.eclipse.jetty.server.Response.resetBuffer(Response.java:1243)[214:org.eclipse.jetty.server:9.2.14.v20151106]
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> ahh it's a closed connection ... which version of Pax-Web are you using?
> And did you check if that bug is already been fixed with Pax-Web?
>
> regards, Achim
>
>
> 2016-03-18 11:54 GMT+01:00 Benson Margulies <ben...@basistech.com>:
>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> http://ops4j.github.io/pax/web/4.2.x/index.html#_advanced_jetty_configuration
>>
>>
>> For my particular application, zero java code is actually preferable.
>> Anyhow, why would configuring it that way prevent Jetty from try to write
>> to closed connections?
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Member
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
> Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>
> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>
>
