I resolved the issue that was causing the misleading display but I’ll spend a little time to see if I can recreate it. No promises but I’ll try.
From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:gno...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 1:43 PM To: user <user@karaf.apache.org> Subject: Re: scr:details command Could you provide the full command output please ? 2016-09-20 18:13 GMT+02:00 Leschke, Scott <slesc...@medline.com<mailto:slesc...@medline.com>>: This is the Karaf scr:details command. It also says that the reference is mandatory (Optional : mandatory) and scr:info says Cardinality: 1..1. So I guess I’m still at how a mandatory reference be unbound but still be satisfied? Hmmm. From: David Jencks [mailto:david.a.jen...@gmail.com<mailto:david.a.jen...@gmail.com>] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 11:05 AM To: user@karaf.apache.org<mailto:user@karaf.apache.org> Subject: Re: scr:details command either - minimum cardinality 0, so it’s always satisfied - the component is not satisfied for some other reason so nothing is bound to any reference. I think this is the karaf scr command so I might be wrong about the meaning. david jencks On Sep 20, 2016, at 8:33 AM, Leschke, Scott <slesc...@medline.com<mailto:slesc...@medline.com>> wrote: I’m confused. What does it mean if scr:details says: State : satisfied Service Reference : No Services bound How can a reference be satisfied if it’s not bound? -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Red Hat, Open Source Integration Email: gno...@redhat.com<mailto:gno...@redhat.com> Web: http://fusesource.com<http://fusesource.com/> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
