Should I create a new issue for this in JIRA?

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Tim Moloney <tim.molo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, the config blocks start like
>
> <config name="*ServiceFactory*-*InstanceName*">
>
> No, I don't start with any custom service configuration files in etc.
> Only the ones that come with Karaf.  After running, however, configuration
> files for each of the services are created in etc (see the last paragraph
> in my original email).
>
> I did notice that if I comment out the config blocks in the features
> repository, a service will get configured only once if I
> - start with a service's configuration file in etc before starting Karaf
> - copy a service's configuration file to etc after starting Karaf
>
> If I understand Karaf correctly, this means that the fileinstall
> capability is working correctly and that its the feature capability that is
> sending configurations to configadmin twice.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>> the <config/> contains a config factory right ? Something like pid-foo ?
>>
>> Do you have the corresponding cfg file in the etc folder ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 11/08/2017 12:58 AM, Tim Moloney wrote:
>>
>>> I'm upgrading an application from Karaf 2.3.3 to 4.0.10 and have it so
>>> that everything compiles and loads correctly.  Unfortunately, the services
>>> are getting configured twice.
>>>
>>> The app configures its services using named <config> blocks in the
>>> features repository.  With Karaf 4.0.10, the service factory's
>>> update(servicePid, dictionary) method is getting called twice with the same
>>> config block (dictionary) but with different servicePids.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on how to get around this issue?
>>>
>>> On a related note, after the services are configured, a new file is
>>> created in the etc directory named after the config block name.  This
>>> didn't happen with Karaf 2.3.3.  Is there a configuration so these files
>>> aren't written?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tim
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbono...@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>

Reply via email to