Hello,

Does not work for us. In our assembly we add a boot feature containing:

    <config name="org.apache.felix.fileinstall-camel">
      felix.fileinstall.dir = ${env:CAMEL_PATH:-/deploy/}
      felix.fileinstall.filter = .*\\.(xml|cfg|groovy)
      felix.fileinstall.poll = 1000
      felix.fileinstall.start.level = 80
      felix.fileinstall.active.level = 80
      felix.fileinstall.log.level = 3
    </config>

The content of this fileinstaller does not get processed on the first
system start. After restart it's fine, but not a viable option. I tired
start+active @ 60,80,100 + start@100 active@80. As well as disable nio2.
In all cases I need to touch a file to make it working.

br,
Matthias

Am Do., 23. Sept. 2021 um 21:05 Uhr schrieb Paul Fraser <pa...@qnenet.com>:

> Yes, running without clean works OK in my case.
>
> Paul Fraser
>
> On 23/9/21 6:45 pm, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > I guess it works fine without the clean arg right ?
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On 22/09/2021 13:15, Jesse White wrote:
> >> We're hitting a similar problem with the deploy/ folder and can
> >> reproduce with a vanilla distribution of Karaf 4.3.3.
> >>
> >> On Mac OS w/ JDK 11:
> >>
> >>    tar zxvf apache-karaf-4.3.3.tar.gz && cd apache-karaf-4.3.3
> >>    cp /tmp/confd-telemetry-feature.xml deploy/
> >>    ./bin/karaf clean
> >>
> >>    karaf@root()> feature:info confd-telemetry-auto
> >>    Feature not found
> >>
> >> Similar test with Karaf 4.3.2 shows:
> >>
> >>    karaf@root()> feature:info  confd-telemetry-auto
> >>    Feature confd-telemetry-auto 1.0.0
> >>    Feature configuration:
> >>      org.opennms.features.telemetry.listeners-single-port-flows
> >>      org.opennms.features.telemetry.listeners-JTI-Listener
> >>      org.opennms.features.telemetry.listeners-NXOS-Listener
> >>    ...
> >>
> >> Here's a reference to the feature file in question:
> >> https://gist.github.com/j-white/1574f34cb94dc2d9166ae9805bd4ba3b
> >> <https://gist.github.com/j-white/1574f34cb94dc2d9166ae9805bd4ba3b>
> >>
> >> Thanks for all the effort in maintaining the distribution - looking
> >> forward to getting R7 up and running with JDK 17!
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Jesse
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> *From:* Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net>
> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 21, 2021 9:39 AM
> >> *To:* user@karaf.apache.org <user@karaf.apache.org>
> >> *Subject:* Re: FileInstaller with 4.3.3
> >> WARNING: This email originated outside of NantHealth.
> >> DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and
> >> are expecting this email.
> >> ________________________________
> >>
> >> Yes, I tried both, no clean, clean as argument, clean in
> >> config.properties.
> >>
> >> All works fine.
> >>
> >> Can you share some details about your test case and environment
> >> (especially if you are on Windows or Unix) ?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>> Le 21 sept. 2021 à 15:00, Matthias Leinweber
> >>> <m.leinwe...@datatactics.de> a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> For me it's a custom dist. Did you do a clean start?
> >>>
> >>> Am Di., 21. Sept. 2021 um 14:28 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofre
> >>> <j...@nanthrax.net>:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I did several test and it works fine for me.
> >>>
> >>> Here’s the very simplest test:
> >>>
> >>> - Starting from Karaf 4.3.3 vanilla
> >>> - I put commons-lang-2.6.jar in the deploy folder (while Karaf is
> >>> stopped)
> >>> - then, I’m starting Karaf with bin/karaf
> >>> - When I checked the bundle:list:
> >>>
> >>> 54 │ Active   │  10 │ 2.6.7              │ OPS4J Pax Url - wrap:
> >>> 55 │ Active   │  80 │ 2.6                │ Commons Lang
> >>>
> >>> So, you can see commons-lang installed and active, meaning the
> >>> deployers deployed it from the deploy folder.
> >>>
> >>> It works for me.
> >>>
> >>> Can you elaborate a bit your test case ?
> >>> Is it a custom distribution ?
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> JB
> >>>
> >>> > Le 20 sept. 2021 à 08:29, Paul Fraser <pa...@qnenet.com> a écrit :
> >>> >
> >>> > Hi JB,
> >>> >
> >>> > Any result on this check?
> >>> >
> >>> > Paul Fraser
> >>> >
> >>> > On 17/9/21 9:55 pm, JB Onofré wrote:
> >>> >> I checked etc I will check deploy now.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Regards
> >>> >> JB
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Le 17 sept. 2021 à 12:29, Paul Fraser <pa...@qnenet.com> a écrit :
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Hi JB,
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> In my case the problem occurs using the deploy folder.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Exact same code in 4.3.2 works, 4.3.3 does not install the
> >>> deploy folder files.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Paul
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> On 17/9/21 7:04 pm, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >>> >>>> Hi,
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> did you updated the etc location in etc/config.properties (in
> >>> the felix.fileinstall.dir property) ?
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> I just tried and it works fine for me. Here's my test case:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> 1. I created etc/my.config.cfg containing foo=bar
> >>> >>>> 2. I'm starting karaf
> >>> >>>> 3. I can see the config loaded:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> karaf@root()> config:list "(service.pid=my.config)"
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> >>>> Pid:            my.config
> >>> >>>> BundleLocation: ?
> >>> >>>> Properties:
> >>> >>>>    felix.fileinstall.filename =
> >>>
> file:/home/jbonofre/Workspace/karaf/assemblies/apache-karaf/target/apache-karaf-4.3.4-SNAPSHOT/etc/my.config.cfg
> >>> >>>>    foo = bar
> >>> >>>>    service.pid = my.config
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Can you share your test case ?
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Regards
> >>> >>>> JB
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>> On 16/09/2021 14:31, Matthias Leinweber wrote:
> >>> >>>>> Hello,
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> I am having a strange issue after I updated my assembly to
> >>> 4.3.3. I am using a custom file installer location which I deploy
> >>> with a feature.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> The strange thing is that the folder is not processed
> >>> automatically at startup, but if I touch a single file in the folder
> >>> all others files get processed as well.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> Any ideas?
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> br,
> >>> >>>>> Matthias
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>           CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >>           This e-mail message and any attachments are only for the use
> >>           of the intended recipient and may contain information that is
> >>           privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under
> >>           applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> >>           disclosure, distribution or other use of this e-mail message
> >>           or attachments is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail
> >>           message in error, please delete and notify the sender
> >>           immediately. Thank you.
> >>
>

Reply via email to