+1.

Colm.

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Mohammad Islam <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> +1. Compliance  with other Hadoop ecosystems is very important.
>
> Regards,
> Mohammad
>
>
> On Monday, September 18, 2017, 10:47:53 AM PDT, Sandeep More <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> That's a good point Larry ! I was thinking for the new features, but yes
> back-porting would be a pain I agree.
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:32 PM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sandeep -
> >
> > This is a good point and I should try and set expectations here properly.
> > I think that it would be good practice to be careful about where we add
> > Java 8 specifics.
> >
> > I would propose that we should limit this use to new features.
> > This will help minimize the pain in backports to previous releases that
> > community members need to continue to support.
> >
> > I would not like to see changes across the codebase to start using things
> > just because we can.
> >
> > It will take some thought sometimes to limit it to new features and we
> > won't catch them all.
> > But the flip side of that is we won't break everyone with a single change
> > if we don't do it against many files at once that don't need it.
> >
> > That's my thoughts on it anyway...
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > --larry
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Sandeep More <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 as well. Also, we should be able to leverage some functionality from
> >> JDK8 without the fear of breaking builds.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Sandeep
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Philip Zampino <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Phil
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 9/18/17, 10:38 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>    All -
> >>>
> >>>    We have been supporting Java 7 long past it's EOL which was in 2015
> >>> in
> >>>    order to be compatible with deployments that are conservative in
> >>> upgrading
> >>>    to Java 8.
> >>>
> >>>    I feel that at this point anyone that has not upgraded is not
> >>> sufficiently
> >>>    concerned about the security implications and that this is no longer
> >>> being
> >>>    conservative. :)
> >>>
> >>>    In addition, a number of components within the hadoop ecosystem have
> >>>    already dropped Java 7 support. The popularity of these particular
> >>>    components more or less means that Java 8 will likely be in place
> >>> anyway.
> >>>
> >>>    This will also enable us to upgrade to the pac4j 2.x releases which
> >>> have
> >>>    features that we would benefit from.
> >>>
> >>>    If anyone has any concerns about this - please feel free to raise a
> >>> flag.
> >>>
> >>>    thanks,
> >>>
> >>>    --larry
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to