I meet the same question. In 1.5.2.1 version it worked fine, but switched
1.5.3 it ofter report this error.

赵天烁 <[email protected]>于2016年8月2日周二 上午11:57写道:

> yes, it is 1.5.3,after limit the date range to a week,it still cost about
> 7 second to response, is there any way to get the query execute detail just
> like the diagnosis log?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> 赵天烁
>
> Kevin Zhao
>
> *[email protected] <[email protected]>*
>
>
>
> 珠海市魅族科技有限公司
>
> MEIZU Technology Co., Ltd.
>
> 广东省珠海市科技创新海岸魅族科技楼
>
> MEIZU Tech Bldg., Technology & Innovation Coast
>
> Zhuhai, 519085, Guangdong, China
>
> meizu.com
>
>
> *From:* ShaoFeng Shi <[email protected]>
> *Date:* 2016-08-01 20:20
> *To:* user <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: Scan row count exceeded threshold
>
> are you on 1.5.3? If not, suggest to upgrade and then retry it. Besides,
> you can add some "where" contition to reduce the records to scan, as the
> error message mentioned.
>
> 2016-08-01 15:37 GMT+08:00 赵天烁 <[email protected]>:
>
>> recently I got the following error while execute query on a cube which is
>> not that big( about 400mb, 20milion record)
>> ==================
>> Error while executing SQL "select FCRASHTIME,count(1) from
>> UXIP.EDL_FDT_OUC_UPLOAD_FILES group by FCRASH_ANALYSIS_ID,FCRASHTIME limit
>> 1": Scan row count exceeded threshold: 10000000, please add filter
>> condition to narrow down backend scan range, like where clause.
>>
>> I guess what  it scan were the intermediate result, but It doesn't any
>> order by,also the result count is limit to just 1.so it could scan to
>> find any record with those two dimension and wala.
>> waiting kylin expert to give me some detail on that.
>> btw how to configure that threshold, any properties in kylin.properties?
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> 赵天烁
>>
>> Kevin Zhao
>>
>> *[email protected] <[email protected]>*
>>
>>
>>
>> 珠海市魅族科技有限公司
>>
>> MEIZU Technology Co., Ltd.
>>
>> 广东省珠海市科技创新海岸魅族科技楼
>>
>> MEIZU Tech Bldg., Technology & Innovation Coast
>>
>> Zhuhai, 519085, Guangdong, China
>>
>> meizu.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Shaofeng Shi
>
>

Reply via email to