Hi ShaoFeng:

Yes, when i deployed all nodes as "all" mode, it worked fine.

ShaoFeng Shi <[email protected]>于2016年8月2日周二 下午10:54写道:

> Hi Tiansheng,
>
> Thanks for the reporting; In 1.5.3 there is some code refactoring, but the
> cluster deployment method didn't change: only one node be "all" and others
> be "query". For the error message "scheduler has not been started" in
> query node, it is a defect (will create a JIRA for that), but that doesn't
> impact the function.
>
> For the second case: making all nodes as "all", there should be only 1
> running the job engine, others saying "fail to acquire lock, scheduler
> has not been started", is that true in your case? Because the zookeeper
> is used as a lock to avoid two job engines be started.
>
> 2016-08-02 20:43 GMT+08:00 张天生 <[email protected]>:
>
>> Btw, i deployed the newest version kylin 1.5.3 version.
>>
>> 张天生 <[email protected]>于2016年8月2日周二 下午8:41写道:
>>
>>> I deployed kylin in cluster mode. There are 1 "all" server and 2 "query"
>>> servers. When i started query server, the following error log appeared:
>>>
>>> 2016-08-02 20:26:55,855 INFO  [Thread-11]
>>> threadpool.DefaultScheduler:178 : server mode: query, no need to run job
>>> scheduler
>>> 2016-08-02 20:26:55,856 ERROR [Thread-11] controller.JobController:91 :
>>> scheduler has not been started
>>> 2016-08-02 20:26:56,856 ERROR [Thread-11] controller.JobController:91 :
>>> scheduler has not been started
>>> 2016-08-02 20:26:57,856 ERROR [Thread-11] controller.JobController:91 :
>>> scheduler has not been started
>>> 2016-08-02 20:26:58,856 ERROR [Thread-11] controller.JobController:91 :
>>> scheduler has not been started
>>> 2016-08-02 20:26:59,857 ERROR [Thread-11] controller.JobController:91 :
>>> scheduler has not been started
>>>
>>> However, when i deployed 3 server in "all" kylin.server.mode, it worked
>>> fine. But offical document said it only one server can run the job
>>> engine(“all” mode or “job” mode), the others must all be “query” mode.I
>>> don't know why, can someone tell me the resson?
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Shaofeng Shi
>
>

Reply via email to