​@shaofeng any insights?​

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Joel Victor <[email protected]> wrote:

> ld think about making this feature optional (A per cube config until we
> find a better solution). This feature is useful when data sets are really
> large, the size of the distinct count step contributes much more to the
> build latency and also where the count step is not complex.
>
> To add to that the size of the table c
>




-- 
Regards,

*Bin Mahone | 马洪宾*

Reply via email to