Hi Gregor, thanks for your answer,
So I think it would make sense to define the same doctype for live-sites then for publishing to avoid different looking and character-behaviour (and driving newbies nuts :-)). What is the advantage of having no-dtd-html?
Gregor wrote:
it was added to cope with some IE problems if i remember correctly
Hmmm. Will that be the "standard-configuration" for 1.4.x (On http://lenya.zones.apache.org:9999/index.html comes "Initialization Problem", so I could'nt look in the html-source there)? On http://lenya.zones.apache.org:8888/default/live/bf0000.html (1.2.4-dev) the doctype is XHTML 1.0 Strict. Will that avoid the mentioned IE problem?
When I began with Cocoon and lenya, I was fascinated of the ease to produce standard-conform html-code. So, afai interpret the ambition of cocoon/lenya right, these cross-browser-attempt should be managed by browser-selectors, instead of changing the behaviour of lenya at all.
Best regards Franz _________________________________________________________________ Nicht lange suchen ? finden! MSN Suche. http://search.msn.de/ Jetzt testen! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
