> I'll be glad to help, maybe I'll find the time to start a page in the > docu publication tonight. If you don't and just want to throw out some thoughts - then I'd be happy to put it on the wiki.
> More specifically, this could mean to provide a standard > publication.xmap in the core This seems very sensible. On a lot of sites we start by copying the default publication and then adding or removing bits - which isn't ideal. I could contribute some time to this. Vik Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Hi Vik, > > Vik Tara schrieb: >> The new firedocs support is a wonderful enhancement to Lenya - I think >> lot's of user's will benefit hugely from it. >> >> Whilst there is an example firedocs publication - there are currently no >> documents describing how to implement firedocs for existing 1.2.x and >> 2.0.x sites. >> >> I would like to correct that situation :) >> >> Any input on this would be greatly appreciated. > > I'll be glad to help, maybe I'll find the time to start a page in the > docu publication tonight. > > BTW, this raises the question if it makes sense to consider promoting > a standarized way to assemble web pages in Lenya publications. More > specifically, this could mean to provide a standard publication.xmap > in the core, probably with certain customization hooks. This way we > could (kind-of) ensure that each publication is editable with Firedocs > and the other editors. This idea is not new, but somehow we never got > around to implement it. > > Would anyone be interested in such a discussion? > > -- Andreas > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
