Ok, great Philip!

2008/4/28 Philip Jägenstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> OK, updated the wiki for you...
>
>  Philip
>
>
>
>  On 4/28/08, Emil Eifrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Philip Jägenstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
>  >  > I'm back with a more philosophical question.
>  >
>  >
>  > Hey Philip,
>  >
>  >  I'm on a five minute break here so let me jump in real quick!
>  >
>  >
>  >  >
>  >  >  http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/One_Minute_Guide_Complete_Code declares
>  >  >
>  >  >  NeoService neo = new EmbeddedNeo("var/base");
>  >  >
>  >  >  The super-awsome (really) http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Design_Guide
>  >  >  consistently uses EmbeddedNeo. When writing code, which ought I use?
>  >
>  >
>  > You should absolutely use NeoService. We didn't have NeoService when
>  >  we first wrote the Design Guide and its showing more than a few signs
>  >  of its age. The only time you should directly refer to EmbeddedNeo is
>  >  once, when you invoke it's constructor to start Neo.
>  >
>  >  Cheers,
>  >
>  >
>  >  --
>  >  Emil Eifrém, CEO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  Neo Technology, www.neotechnology.com
>  >  Cell: +46 733 462 271 | US: 206 403 8808
>  >  _______________________________________________
>  >  Neo mailing list
>  >  User@lists.neo4j.org
>  >  https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>  >
>  _______________________________________________
>  Neo mailing list
>  User@lists.neo4j.org
>  https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
_______________________________________________
Neo mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to