Hi! Anders Nawroth wrote: > * fast
After a little more testing (with the same warm up every time ...), reality proved me wrong here: the traverser is slower. Could it be the checking against relationship types that adds to the time? > * uses less memory Confirmed, much less stack is used. In my test node space the traverser is fine with 96k stack size, while the recursive solution will require 512k. I added back the recursive solution, so it's easy to change how it works. You'll understand the new method names :-) /anders > > I left the old checkNode() method (not used any more) for now. > > WDYT? > > /anders > _______________________________________________ > Neo mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
