Hi Mattias Cool, you guys do get stuff fixed fast.
All the best Neil On 28 Jul 2009, at 12:10, Mattias Persson wrote: > I just committed a fix for it (rev. 3017) ... it should do the trick > > 2009/7/28 Mattias Persson <matt...@neotechnology.com>: >> You're absolutely right... I see the problem in the iterator >> implementation of that method. I or Johan will fix that soon. >> >> 2009/7/27 Neil Ellis <neil.el...@peepwl.com>: >>> Hi guys >>> >>> I noticed a side-effect in the iterator for all nodes. >>> >>> If you do not do a hasNext() before a next() you get a no such >>> element >>> exception. So even if I have a million nodes .next() on the first >>> node >>> throws an exception, unless I do a hasNext() check first. I >>> believe a >>> hasXXX() method should be without side effect, is that fair comment? >>> >>> All the best >>> Neil >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Neo mailing list >>> User@lists.neo4j.org >>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] >> Neo Technology, www.neotechnology.com >> > > > > -- > Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] > Neo Technology, www.neotechnology.com > _______________________________________________ > Neo mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
