Thanks Peter. That's what made sense to me but I could see the alternative as being valid so I wanted to check.
Jonny On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Peter Neubauer <neubauer.pe...@gmail.com>wrote: > Jonny, > the ReturnableEvaluator is just deciding whether the current node > should be included in the set of results that are returned or not. It > does not stop the traversal - that is the job of the StopEvaluator > that returns a boolean for stopping the traversal. > > HTH > > /peter > > GTalk: neubauer.peter > Skype peter.neubauer > Phone +46 704 106975 > LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer > Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer > > http://www.neo4j.org - New Energy for Data - The Graph > Database. > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - > Open Participation Software. > http://www.linkedprocess.org - Distributed computing on LinkedData scale > > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Jonny Wray<jwray.deve...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I had a clarification question regarding the ReturnableEvaluator > behaviour. > > When the evaluator returns false does that result in a stop of traversal > > also or does the traversal continue beyond the node not returned? I can > see > > both being valid situations (I need the former) so just want to be sure > of > > the behaviour before I go forward. > > > > thanks > > Jonny > > _______________________________________________ > > Neo mailing list > > User@lists.neo4j.org > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Neo mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
