2010/1/29 Symeon (Akis) Papadopoulos <papa...@iti.gr>: > Mattias Persson wrote: >> Another problem I see is that you're having too granular transactions >> which will slow down the insertion process quite a bit. Try grouping a >> couple of thousands operations in one transaction and you'll see a >> performance boost! >> >> FYI: I can trigger the problem you were having with lucene "too many >> open files" issue. And I'm almost 100% sure that it will be resolved >> if you increase the span of your transactions. >> > That's what we are already doing through the class SimpleBatchTxManager > (in package org.neo4j.util). We group read and write transactions in > batches of some thousands. Isn't this correct? You're right, sorry for missing that.
However I just found the bug which causes this... hang on, I'll fix it in an hour or two! > > > _______________________________________________ > Neo mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Neo Technology, www.neotechnology.com _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
