2010/5/17 Kiss Miklós <kissmik...@freemail.hu>

> I enabled the lucene index cache for the mostly used properties and it
> made a huge difference!
>
Great

>
> Regarding the VM heap size, I started with 128MB but already tried to
> increase it to 512MB but didn't help. Now I'm trying to estimate the
> actual memory requirement. I guess that using lucene index cache further
> increases the memory requirement.
>
Yeah it does... do you have much RAM in your machine? try to increase the
heap to 1 or 2 Gb and see what happens.

>
> Miklós
>
> 2010.05.17. 11:15 keltezéssel, Mattias Persson írta:
> > 2010/5/17 Kiss Miklós<kissmik...@freemail.hu>
> >
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the answer.
> >> No I haven't looked at lucene index cache yet but will soon, thanks for
> >> the tip.
> >> The strings I store are mostly about 10 characters long but I also have
> >> some about 30 chars. I wouldn't consider these as 'big strings'.
> >>
> >>
> > That's a very common (and rather optimal for Neo4j) string size.
> >
> > Is it a good choice to put all write operations into one transaction?
> >
> >> This means in my case a few thousand nodes (2-5000) and about 4-5 times
> >> more relation. Or would it give better performance if I sliced operation
> >> into smaller transactions? What would be the optimal transaction size?
> >>
> >>
> > That should yield a good write performance, yes. How much heap have you
> > given the JVM? Write operations in a transaction is kept in memory until
> > committed so if you don't have a big heap size it can be a problem and
> cause
> > out-of-memory problems like you encountered...
> >
> >
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >> Miklos
> >>
> >> 2010.05.17. 9:35 keltezéssel, Mattias Persson írta:
> >>
> >>> Hi, sorry for a late response.
> >>>
> >>> Yep, this seems like an excellent fit for Neo4j. Regarding lucene index
> >>> lookup performance: have you looked at enabling caching
> >>> http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Indexing_with_IndexService#Caching ? It
> >>>
> >> can
> >>
> >>> speed up lookups considerably.
> >>>
> >>> Do you store very big strings or just few words? Neo4j currently isn't
> >>> optimal at storing big strings. For this an integration with another
> >>> database could be a solution.
> >>>
> >>> 2010/5/10 Kiss Miklós<kissmik...@freemail.hu>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd like to ask if using Neo4j would be a good solution for the
> >>>> following scenario.
> >>>> I have an application which performs some natural language text
> >>>> analysis. I want to put the results of this analysis into a database.
> I
> >>>> have words, stems, collocations, themes and many relations between
> them.
> >>>> This is why neo4j seems to be a good solution.
> >>>> However, I ran into performance problems: I need to use lucene index
> >>>> service heavily (I have to look up if a node I'm up to store already
> >>>> exists) which I think is a bit slow. The other problem is java heap
> >>>> space: some documents cause my app to halt with out of memory
> exception
> >>>> (for which I couldn't yet find the reason).
> >>>>
> >>>> My questions are:
> >>>> 1, Is my data storage scenario a good one (nodes = words, relations =
> >>>> relations) or there could be a better one?
> >>>> 2, How should I perform the lookup of nodes in the database?
> >>>> 3, Or should I use some other database?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks in advance,
> >>>> Miklós
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Neo mailing list
> >>>> User@lists.neo4j.org
> >>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Neo mailing list
> >> User@lists.neo4j.org
> >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Neo mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>



-- 
Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com]
Hacker, Neo Technology
www.neotechnology.com
_______________________________________________
Neo mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to