yes :) atle
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Mattias Persson <matt...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > 2010/6/16 Atle Prange <atle.pra...@gmail.com>: >> Yes, babudb would for example be very fast for a primary key index. >> >> How do you think a trie implemented in neo4j would compare to the >> others? One could have relationship types for each letter. Then a >> search for the word "faster", would involve six >> Node.getRelationShip(RelationshipType,Direction) calls and six >> Relationship.getEndNode() calls. Insertion would at worst case create >> six nodes and six relationships. >> >> It would also be interesting to test the performance given a more >> realistic usage pattern. For example many random reads and writes. One >> reason for lucene to beat babudb might be its caching or batching >> capabilities. > Yeah that'd be interesting... and probably quite easy to try out. Are > you feeling up to it? :) >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo4j mailing list >> User@lists.neo4j.org >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> > > > > -- > Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] > Hacker, Neo Technology > www.neotechnology.com > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
