2011/2/3 Massimo Lusetti <mluse...@gmail.com> > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Tobias Ivarsson > <tobias.ivars...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > > > You are doing I/O bound work. More then two threads is most likely just > > going to add overhead and make things slower! > > I'm certainly doing something wired cause the performance of my tests > aren't linear. > > I've run the app and let it process two big data files and this are > the results: 2986666 rows in 3465742 ms and 2897177 rows in 3483767 ms > which are values not in line with the performance of the other test > which used just only 100000 rows. With more rows the performance > dropped down to values between 1.160404947 ms per row and 1.202469507 > ms per row. The overall DB size (I measure only the db directory) has > grown as well far behond the expected values: 4.9G ... > > Do you or anyone else have any clue? >
Lucene lookup performance degrades the bigger the index gets. That may be a reason. > > Thanks > -- > Massimo > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
