Hi all, In almost all applications/examples/doc/wiki I've seen on neo4j.org the domain is based on POJO and this is somewhat usual but here I see you suggesting doing interface for POJO.
Having an Actor interface implemented by an ActorImpl classes which is a POJO plus a reference to the "underlying node". First why having an interface declaring a POJO just for getters/setters method, isn't this boilerplate code? Second since you do that, why not exposing the "underlying node" as a getter so you can just use Actor and never had to cast it to ActorImpl? Am I missing something? Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
