Thank you Peter. These examples are really helpful and up-to-date.

Best regards,
James

2011/5/11 Peter Neubauer <peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com>

> Jean-Pierre,
> we are in the process of moving the Getting started guides to
> docs.neo4j,org, along with a number of good examples, amongst others on
> traversal. You might find
> http://components.neo4j.org/neo4j-examples/1.4-SNAPSHOT/ interesting, too?
>
> Cheers,
>
> /peter neubauer
>
> GTalk:      neubauer.peter
> Skype       peter.neubauer
> Phone       +46 704 106975
> LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
> Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
>
> http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph database.
> http://startupbootcamp.org/    - Ă–resund - Innovation happens HERE.
> http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.
>
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Jean-Pierre Bergamin <
> jpberga...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Thank you Tobias. This "new" traversal framework looks much more powerful
> > and "fluent" then the traverser I have been playing with so far. The
> > getting
> > started guide should definitively point to it.
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > James
> >
> >
> > 2011/5/11 Tobias Ivarsson <tobias.ivars...@neotechnology.com>
> >
> > > There is a tentative new traversal API included in Neo4j that features
> > this
> > > functionality:
> > >
> > > org.neo4j.kernel.Traversal.description().expand(
> > >    org.neo4j.kernel.Traversal.expanderForAllTypes( Direction.OUTGOING )
> > );
> > >
> > > You can read more about it here:
> > > http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Traversal_Framework
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Tobias
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Jean-Pierre Bergamin
> > > <jpberga...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello neo4j users
> > > >
> > > > I'm just diving into neo4j and playing around with graph algorithms
> and
> > > > traversers.
> > > > As a start, I just wanted to traverse the whole graph with all
> > > relationship
> > > > types in the OUTGOING direction. The traverse() method always expects
> a
> > > > RelationshipType.
> > > > Is there a simpler way to traverse all RelationshipTypes then
> building
> > up
> > > > an
> > > > array that contains all types and the outgoing direction (as
> described
> > > here
> > > > http://sujitpal.blogspot.com/2009/06/custom-traverser-for-neo4j.html
> )?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the help,
> > > > James
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Neo4j mailing list
> > > > User@lists.neo4j.org
> > > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tobias Ivarsson <tobias.ivars...@neotechnology.com>
> > > Hacker, Neo Technology
> > > www.neotechnology.com
> > > Cellphone: +46 706 534857
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Neo4j mailing list
> > > User@lists.neo4j.org
> > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Neo4j mailing list
> > User@lists.neo4j.org
> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to