Well first I should add some more documentation/comments :-P and then we 
could review the code.



Am 07.06.2011 22:29, schrieb Craig Taverner:
> I suggest you code review them first. Especially since there are API
> changes.
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Peter Neubauer<
> peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com>  wrote:
>
>> Very nice Andreas!
>>
>> You consider it safe to pull these changes into the main repo?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> /peter neubauer
>>
>> GTalk:      neubauer.peter
>> Skype       peter.neubauer
>> Phone       +46 704 106975
>> LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
>> Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
>>
>> http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph database.
>> http://startupbootcamp.org/    - Ă–resund - Innovation happens HERE.
>> http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Andreas Wilhelm<a...@kabelbw.de>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This week I implemented update and search capability for spatial
>>> functions and following spatial functions with JUnit tests:
>>>
>>> ST_AsText, ST_AsKML, ST_AsGeoJSON, ST_AsBinary and ST_Reverse.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>>
>>> Andreas
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Neo4j mailing list
>>> User@lists.neo4j.org
>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Neo4j mailing list
>> User@lists.neo4j.org
>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>

_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to