Yes,
I am thinking along the lines of the Cypher return tables, see
http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/cypher-plugin.html in which
there is a column with Node representations, and a column with just a
String, etc.

Cheers,

/peter neubauer

GTalk:      neubauer.peter
Skype       peter.neubauer
Phone       +46 704 106975
LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer

http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph database.
http://startupbootcamp.org/    - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE.
http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.



On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Marcelo Barbudas <nos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tables look great. Just right now googled them.
>
> Will they return something JSON encoded like [ row, row ],
> where row is [ hash, hash ]?
>
>
> -m.
>
> On 06/15/2011 11:13 PM, Peter Neubauer wrote:
>> Great!
>>
>> I plan to upgrade to Gremlin 1.1 tomorrow if the source is with me,
>> and add support even for the table() return construct, so you can do
>> the full shebang there :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> /peter neubauer
>>
>> GTalk:      neubauer.peter
>> Skype       peter.neubauer
>> Phone       +46 704 106975
>> LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
>> Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
>>
>> http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph database.
>> http://startupbootcamp.org/    - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE.
>> http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Marcelo Barbudas <nos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I was doing something wrong on my end. I could see the resulting map but
>>> with different values in the web console from the rest plugin. It turns
>>> out there was a lingering variable in the web console that I forgot to
>>> reset and now I am getting the same values.
>>>
>>> Thanks Peter.
>>>
>>>
>>> -m.
>>>
>>> On 06/15/2011 11:03 PM, Peter Neubauer wrote:
>>>> Well,
>>>> you get as the result from your expression whatever the last statement
>>>> is, since from a script, there is only one return construct. You could
>>>> try putting things into a map or so ( both the count and the list of
>>>> nodes) and return that?
>>>>
>>>> Alternatively, we could send back all bound variables in the return,
>>>> but that is very cryptic in its side effects and IMHO not a clean way
>>>> to do this. WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> /peter neubauer
>>>>
>>>> GTalk:      neubauer.peter
>>>> Skype       peter.neubauer
>>>> Phone       +46 704 106975
>>>> LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
>>>> Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
>>>>
>>>> http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph database.
>>>> http://startupbootcamp.org/    - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE.
>>>> http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Marcelo Barbudas <nos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hey Peter,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think I understand.
>>>>>
>>>>> So that means I can get a sort listed of nodes (the contents of m keys),
>>>>> but not the actual number on which the sorting was based (m values)?
>>>>>
>>>>> -m.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/15/2011 10:46 PM, Peter Neubauer wrote:
>>>>>> Marcelo,
>>>>>> the Gremlin plugin is transforming the results from a query into Neo4j
>>>>>> REST conform structures, while the console is a pure command line
>>>>>> interpreter, outputting strings that are not consumable by clients.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does that make sense?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /peter neubauer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GTalk:      neubauer.peter
>>>>>> Skype       peter.neubauer
>>>>>> Phone       +46 704 106975
>>>>>> LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
>>>>>> Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph 
>>>>>> database.
>>>>>> http://startupbootcamp.org/    - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE.
>>>>>> http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Marcelo Barbudas <nos...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> n.outE.inV.inE.outV.groupCount(m) >> -1;m.sort{a,b -> b.value <=> 
>>>>>>>> a.value}
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yep, this versions runs and returns.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However the returned values from the web interface are different from
>>>>>>> the ones via the gremlin plugin.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -m.
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Neo4j mailing list
>>>>>>> User@lists.neo4j.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Neo4j mailing list
>>>>>> User@lists.neo4j.org
>>>>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Neo4j mailing list
>>>>> User@lists.neo4j.org
>>>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Neo4j mailing list
>>>> User@lists.neo4j.org
>>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Neo4j mailing list
>>> User@lists.neo4j.org
>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Neo4j mailing list
>> User@lists.neo4j.org
>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to