Any suggestions on this please ?
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:03 PM, V <vlin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I created a graph model with 2 classes Node and Element as follows:
>
> public class Node {
>
> @RelatedTo(type = "ELEMENT", elementClass = Element.class, direction =
> OUTGOING)
> private Set<Element> Element;
>
>
> public void addElement(Element e) {
> relateTo(e, Relationships.ELEMENT.toString());
> }
>
> }
>
> public class Element{
>
> public String name;
>
> }
> I want to create an in memory graph structure without persisting the nodes
> as follows :
>
> Node n = new Node();
> n.addElement(new Element());
>
> *However it throws an exception as the Node n has not been persisted so
> the call to relateTo(..) fails. *
>
> If instead I do
> n.persist()
> and then call addElement(..) it works fine as the aspect kicks in.
>
> Any workaround for this ? That is, is there a way I can still use the
> above style without persisting the Node object ?
>
>
> My application needs this as first I create a structure and persist it, and
> then I create another structure to pass around some values to the persisted
> structure when doing some computations.
>
> -Karan
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
