James, didn't know that things can mess up between issue trackers - this commit is referring to https://github.com/neo4j/community/issues/12 which I fixed with that commit.
Unique indexes are on the roadmap, but I doubt we will get them in for 1.5 :/ since they will involve a fair bit of changes in the indexing guts. Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph database. http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party. On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:29 PM, espeed <ja...@jamesthornton.com> wrote: > > Peter Neubauer wrote: > > > > Keeping an index and check it for an existing value us most > > straightforward. > > We are thinking of supporting uniqueness as a first class operation in > for > > instance the auto index configuration. > > > > Hi Peter - > > It looks like you recently added support for unique indices/properties... > > > http://neo4jdb.lighthouseapp.com/projects/77609/tickets/12-add-unique-property-behavior-to-the-auto-indexing-framework > > Will this be in the next release? > > - James > > -- > View this message in context: > http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Node-uniqueness-tp3305993p3317045.html > Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
