Right, id is an implicit field ... works when not in transaction.
If i remove that test, then I fail on the later index.get.
As far as deleting the db, it's not in my test, but i removed the folder
in y real code and manually before running the test.
On 10/8/11 11:10 AM, Rick Bullotta wrote:
> If I remember correctly, neo has an implicit field on each index, and the
> name is either "id" or "_id".
>
> On Oct 8, 2011, at 1:58 PM, "Chris Gioran"<chris.gio...@neotechnology.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Thibaut,
>>
>> I noticed the following snippet in your test case code:
>>
>> long id = node.getId();
>> node.setProperty("testProp", "test");
>> index.add(node, "testProp", "test");
>>
>> Assert.assertEquals(node.getProperty("testProp"), "test");
>>
>> // Lookup By id
>> Assert.assertNotNull(graphDb.getNodeById(id));
>>
>> // Now via Index
>> Node found = index.get("id", id).getSingle();
>> Assert.assertNotNull(found);
>> Assert.assertEquals(found.getId(), id);
>>
>> which leads to the first test failure with a null result returned.
>> Here you are indexing a node with key "testProp" and value "test" but
>> you go on to ask it from the index with key "id" and value its id.
>> Since you haven't added that key/value pair in the index, rightfully
>> you don't get any results - the test fails in my setup even with the
>> native Neo4j transaction manager.
>>
>> I changed that to ask the node from the index with the proper
>> key/value pair and the test passes - the same thing happens a bit
>> further down where you ask the index for a node with a key/value of
>> "testProp"/"prop" (instead of "testProp"/"test"). Moreover, it passes
>> with both the native Transaction Manager and the Atomikos
>> implementation.
>>
>> Also, you are not deleting the db for the test - this means that since
>> you add to the index nodes with the same key/value the test will pass
>> only on the first run as getSingle() on the index hits will find the
>> previously added nodes and it will fail.
>>
>> Could you try that out and see if it solves your issues?
>>
>> I am glad that this functionality is being used in production - please
>> provide any feedback on any problems and what you think of this
>> feature.
>>
>> hope that helps,
>> CG
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 7:50 PM, tcolar<tco...@colar.net> wrote:
>>> I've been trying to make this work for a few days but while it mostly works,
>>> the Lucene index just won't.
>>>
>>> We have a fairly complex setup including neo4j, mysql, mongo and JMS ad
>>> trying to do transactions accross all that with Atomikos.
>>>
>>> Since that is quite complex, I've made a smaller unit test just using
>>> Atomikos and Neo4j to demonstrate the issue:
>>>
>>> https://bitbucket.org/tcolar/stuff/src/ddd17191e9a4/AtomikosNeo4j
>>>
>>> The main test is here:
>>> https://bitbucket.org/tcolar/stuff/src/ddd17191e9a4/AtomikosNeo4j/src/test/java/net/colar/atomikosNeo4j/AtomikosNeo4jTest.java
>>>
>>> and results:
>>> https://bitbucket.org/tcolar/stuff/src/ddd17191e9a4/AtomikosNeo4j/test.log
>>>
>>> I used
>>> http://digitalstain.blogspot.com/2010/11/using-jotm-as-transactionmanager-in.html
>>> to get me going.
>>>
>>> And my code for that part is here:
>>> https://bitbucket.org/tcolar/stuff/src/ddd17191e9a4/AtomikosNeo4j/src/main/java/net/colar/atomikosNeo4j
>>>
>>> I'm thinking that's probably where I'm doing something wrong maybe ?
>>>
>>> I'm probably not doing something right but i can't seem to find what's going
>>> on with Lucene.
>>>
>>> The test works if not using Atomikos but just plain Neo4j Transactions.
>>>
>>> Anybody as an idea what is wrong?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Trying-to-use-Neo4J-with-Atomikos-transaction-manager-issues-with-Lucene-index-tp3400319p3400319.html
>>> Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at
>>> Nabble.com.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Neo4j mailing list
>>> User@lists.neo4j.org
>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Neo4j mailing list
>> User@lists.neo4j.org
>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
