On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Michael Hunger < michael.hun...@neotechnology.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > in the pattern matching employed by cypher nodes already bound to an > identifier won't be bound to another identifier. > I was thinking this was a bug when I saw Didis mail here, but wasn't sure so I didn't answer. Is there a complex reason why this is the case, and is it going to stay this way? It feels a bit counter-intuitive.. > > That is the reason why all nodes that already belong to principals don't > appear in n. > > In your case it might be easiest to just "return n,principals" > > Cheers > > Michael > > Am 02.11.2011 um 10:56 schrieb D. Frej: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a very simply graph: > > > > UserGroup 2 <-[:IS_MEMBER_OF]- UserGroup 1, User 3 > > UserGroup 1 <-[:IS_MEMBER_OF]- User 1, User 2 > > > > I use the following cypher to find all nodes that are below UserGroup 2 > > (I start at node User 3 and go one level up in the tree which equals > > UserGroup 2): > > > > START principals=node:nodes(NAME='User 3') > > MATCH (principals)-[:IS_MEMBER_OF]->()<-[:IS_MEMBER_OF*0..]-(n)" > > RETURN n > > > > The result does not contain User 3 even though it is a child of > > UserGroup2 and connected to it via IS_MEMBER_OF relationship. Is there > > any way to also include it in the result? > > > > Thanks, > > > > - Didi > > _______________________________________________ > > Neo4j mailing list > > User@lists.neo4j.org > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > -- Jacob Hansson Phone: +46 (0) 763503395 Twitter: @jakewins _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
