What about atDepth(0) ? Michael
Am 03.11.2011 um 03:33 schrieb Peter Neubauer: > Alex, > looking at the source, the Evaluators.toDepth() does: > > public static Evaluator toDepth( final int depth ) > { > return new Evaluator() > { > public Evaluation evaluate( Path path ) > { > return path.length() < depth ? > Evaluation.INCLUDE_AND_CONTINUE : Evaluation.INCLUDE_AND_PRUNE; > } > }; > } > > So it won't work. However, question is if it should be inclusive or > not. WDYAT? I could change it to > > return path.length() <= depth ? Evaluation.INCLUDE_AND_CONTINUE : > Evaluation.INCLUDE_AND_PRUNE; > > Cheers, > > /peter neubauer > > GTalk: neubauer.peter > Skype peter.neubauer > Phone +46 704 106975 > LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer > Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer > > http://www.neo4j.org - NOSQL for the Enterprise. > http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Ă–resund - Innovation happens HERE. > > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Alex <a...@auv.name> wrote: >> Hi everybody >> >> when setting fromDepth and toDepth both at zero, like in the following code >> >> Traversal.description.breadthFirst >> .evaluator(Evaluators.fromDepth(0)) >> .evaluator(Evaluators.toDepth(0)) >> >> I'm expecting to get only the start node, but I don't. Am I missing >> anything? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Cheers >> Alex >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/zero-fromDepth-and-toDepth-tp3474825p3474825.html >> Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo4j mailing list >> User@lists.neo4j.org >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user