A Path with null in it doesn't make much sense to me. I'd prefer b) also. Den lördagen den 12:e november 2011 skrev Andres Taylor< andres.tay...@neotechnology.com>: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 3:02 PM, D. Frej <dieter_f...@gmx.net> wrote: > >> to understand the question correctly: is it something like >> (a)-[:REL_TYPE*0..1]->(b) >> > > Sorry for not being clearer... > > No, that pattern is safe - it will never contain a null. The optional > relationships have a question mark in them, like this: > > (a)-[?:REL_TYPE]->(b) > > Andrés > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >
-- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
