I'm curious about how it's going. Cheers, James
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <[email protected]> wrote: > We are now working on the last 5-10 failing tests in core. Still some code > left to port though. > On May 10, 2015 5:37 PM, "James Lewis" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It seems it was on the verge a couple of of weeks ago. I'm wondering how > > it's going. > > > > Cheers, > > James > > On Apr 21, 2015 6:06 AM, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Status update: > > > > > > We are down to about 20 failing tests (thanks Laimis!) > > > > > > #1 + #2 are both fixed. Still more isolated tests left, and are up for > > > grabs. > > > > > > I'm currently working on the Analysis.Common sub-project, as it is a > > > prerequisite for a release (we can't release core without a proper > > analysis > > > package). > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > > > Lucene.NET committer and PMC member > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > We are nearly there -- we are this close to a release! > > > > > > > > We have only about 30 failing tests now in the core, and I'd like to > > push > > > > hard during the next few days so we can get a beta out next week. > > > > > > > > I'd appreciate your help with this! > > > > > > > > I've narrowed down several failing tests that require some digging, > if > > > > folks can assign those to themselves and send us PRs fixing those > > tests, > > > > that would help a lot! > > > > > > > > 1. Lucene.Net.Search.TestNumericRangeQuery32.TestInfiniteValues() > > > > and Lucene.Net.Search.TestNumericRangeQuery64.TestInfiniteValues() -- > > > > specifically it seems like Double and Float NaNs are treated > > differently > > > > between C# and Java and therefore the failing tests. Or there is a > bug > > in > > > > the inner implementation handling those queries. > > > > > > > > 2. TestLucene40DocValuesFormat has a few failing tests, probably > > exposing > > > > data corruption in one of the codec components. I believe this is > > > contained > > > > in the 40DocValues tests so the scope isn't huge but I could be > wrong. > > > > > > > > 3. TestLucene42DocValuesFormat has two tests failing with output of > > lines > > > > like "Fail: frozenHash=182658 vs h=5124052". Something is off in > > > computing > > > > the hashes of the nodes, or maybe the node construction is faulty > > (which > > > is > > > > a serious bug). Hashing is done in Lucene.Net.Fst.NodeHash<T>, > that'll > > > be a > > > > good starting point. Also see > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/commit/ea7cfe6972972f91090d995c729689fff9a0f54c > > > > > > > > 4. There seem to be some concurrency issues with file handling, > > probably > > > > on the part that is in charge of acquiring and releasing locks. In > > > > particular see TestDocValuesFormat, > > > > .TestShardSearching.TestSimple(), > > > TestBufferedIndexInput.TestSetBufferSize(), > > > TestLockFactory.TestStressLocks(), > > > TestLockFactory.TestStressLocksNativeFSLockFactory() > > > > > > > > 5. RegexpQuery seems to be broken, I believe the underlying automaton > > > > implementation doesn't emit the terms correctly. See the failures in > > > > TestRegexpQuery and TestRegexpRandom. > > > > > > > > 6. Similar but probably unrelated failing test is > > > > at TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper.TestFuzzy2() > > > > > > > > 7. An interesting failure to investigate is here: > > > > TestIndexableBinaryStringTools.TestEncodedSortability() -- probably a > > > > simple porting fail, a subtle Java <--> C# mismatch that we haven't > > > noticed. > > > > > > > > Additionally, any help with porting the subprojects would be great. > > Some > > > > folks took some subprojects under their wings and never reported > back. > > If > > > > you could either complete the work, or donate whatever you have done > so > > > > far, that would be great. > > > > > > > > As always, get the code from here: > https://github.com/apache/lucenenet > > > -- > > > > work on your fork and send us a PR when ready, with a good > description > > of > > > > what you've done. > > > > > > > > To see the list of currently failing tests in real-time, go here (you > > can > > > > login as guest): > > > > > > > > > > http://teamcity.codebetter.com/viewType.html?buildTypeId=LuceneNet_Core&branch_LuceneNet=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv > > > > > > > > Thanks, and happy searching, > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > > > > Lucene.NET committer and PMC member > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
