Marvin, > Int32Type is already `sortable`, and since RangeQuery needs sortable field > types, ranges should work now. >
When I do a range query on a sortable Int32Type I get an error: "term is a Lucy::Object::CharBuf, and not comparable to a Lucy::Object::Integer32" I use the range in the same way as in the example: http://search.cpan.org/~creamyg/Lucy-0.3.3/lib/Lucy/Search/RangeQuery.pod > A lot of times people have been able to simulate numeric fields by hacking in > leading zeroes. Do you know if there is a speed difference between sorting on Int32Type fields and text fields with leading zero's ? Thomas den Braber
