On 14-Mar-08, at 9:04 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Nothing stopping you from developing it.
I'd like to :)
I think it would be better to work on a Maven SCM Team Provider.
But we have no immediate
plans. What we would actually like to pursue is a Maven SCM provider
so that we wouldn't have to do things like re-implement subversion
support twice. No, it's not in the cards from our end unless someone
like Polarion was interested.
Subversive should be the official SVN provider in Eclipse 3.4 isn't it
so having some support for it seems reasonable ?
I haven't heard anything to that affect but I'm not as close to
eclipse.org as I should be. In addition Eugene is a Subclipse
committer so we obviously have a preference there just because we are
connected to the Subclipse community. But again, given the Maven
philosophy we want to work on an API that works in the other IDEs as
well.
Regards
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth.
-- Unknown
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
