Pedro Pedruzzi wrote:
Using Maven as build tool, I would prefer running every build phase
with it. For example, if I ask maven to build, pack and install some
project, it will pass trough the test phase. If some tests happen to
fail than I will have to rerun those externaly (from Maven) to get
more information (stack trace) and have IDE integration, without
having to handle generated report files directly.

It is really very natural testing with 'Run as...', but if Maven has
its own testing phase, it would be very nice to have that more
integrated with JUnit or TestNG, eclipse GUIs (specially in a failure
case).
I see where you coming from, but that I guess it really depend on the developer's workflow.

The primary goal of m2eclipse is to support quick turnaround during development cycles and to facilitate edit, compile (which is done transparently by JDT) and test from within the IDE. Using workspace resolution provided by m2eclipse you don't have to install or deploy anything while coding. So you don't really need to run mvn install in order to run your tests. Again, because m2eclipse made it transparent, using Run As... / JUnit in the IDE would give you the same results as running mvn test (assuming that you have up to date project configuration in the IDE). You don't really want to run "mvn install" every time you edited something in your IDE, but at the point you get to installing your stuff you should be secure that all tests would pass.

All in all I'd say it wouldn't be a high priority for m2eclipse team to implement support showing surefire reports in junit view, but if someone would want to contribute such feature, we will be glad to accept the patch and will help implementing it.

 regards,
 Eugene



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to