On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 4-Mar-09, at 9:15 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
>
>> I originally hoped that some clever naming scheme would allow resolution
>> of Eclipse/OSGi dependencies from Maven repositories. Unfortunately, I could
>> not come up with such a scheme and eventually convinced myself it was not
>> possible (but I'd be happy to be proved wrong here).
>>
>> I still believe artifactId == bundleId convention makes sense, but it is
>> not enforced in Tycho.
>>
>
> +1
>
> The convention of artifactId == bundleId is what I've agreed on with Peter
> Kriens and I'm sure we'll just decide this is the case at the OSGi tooling
> summit.
>
I didn't realize the agreement was that firm. One couldn't really ask
for a more authoritative answer than an agreement between you and
Peter Kriens.
It would be really helpful if someone published the results of that
OSGi tooling summit discussion you mentioned.
Specifically, guidance is needed/requested for:
* relationship between Bundle-SymbolicName and Maven coordinates
* dots vs. dashes
* versioning scheme alignment in Maven 3
* possible future Maven feature of OSGI-ifying jars by default
I also wonder if the following will become the norm for bundle projects.
<groupId>someGroupId</groupId>
<artifactId>${project.groupId}.someArtifactId</artifactId>
Thanks,
Luke
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
