Doing a 1.13 release sounds good. Backward compatibility breaking Interface changes require more discussion as suggested. +1
NJ On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Jingyi Mei <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on the 1.13 release. We can add our new features that don't require > interface change to 1.13, and take more time for 2.0 features/interface > change. Looking forward to new features and feature improvement in 1.13! > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Rashmi Raghu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 on the 1.13 release. >> It would be good to take the time for more feedback on 2.0 features / >> interface change since there won't be any backward compatibility. >> >> Thanks, >> Rashmi >> >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Rahul Iyer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 on doing a 1.13 release next. The 2.0 theme and features need to be >>> fleshed out further before doing a major version change. >>> The current theme for 1.13 looks good - looking forward to a productive >>> release in the next 2 months. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> iR >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Frank McQuillan <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Ed for your offer to contribute. Are you interested in this >>>> JIRA: >>>> >>>> Support modern versions of gcc >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1025 >>>> ? >>>> Seems like a gap we should fill. >>>> >>>> >>>> Looking thru the 2.0 JIRAs, the emerging themes seem to be: performance >>>> improvements, more graph algorithms, misc feature improvements:. For e.g., >>>> >>>> [performance] >>>> Add mini-batching to IGD framework >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1048 >>>> >>>> >>>> [graph] >>>> HITS >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1124 >>>> >>>> graph cut >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1074 >>>> >>>> >>>> [feature impr] >>>> k-NN distance functions >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1059 >>>> >>>> Neural nets grouping >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1149 >>>> >>>> >>>> This seems reasonable to me, to have various different types of things >>>> coming into 1.13 rather than a single theme . The mini-batching is >>>> something I am excited about since it could help performance for a number >>>> of different modules that use gradient descent. >>>> >>>> But I'll wait till next week to get more comments from the community >>>> before making any version changes. >>>> >>>> Frank >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Ed Espino <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I like the idea of not rushing the Apache MADlib v2.0 and giving the >>>>> new >>>>> interface time to sufficiently bake. Beyond the three items marked >>>>> resolved >>>>> for v2.0, do we have a sense of what the theme will be for MADlib >>>>> v1.13? >>>>> >>>>> Current items targeted with v2.0: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MADLIB/versions/12333619 >>>>> >>>>> FYI: I'm looking for ways to contribute to v1.13! >>>>> >>>>> -=e >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Frank McQuillan < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > MADlib community, >>>>> > >>>>> > tl;dr >>>>> > >>>>> > Proposing we do a 1.13 release in Nov before Thanksgiving, and a 2.0 >>>>> after >>>>> > that around Jan. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > More >>>>> > >>>>> > The next release is currently numbered 2.0 as per current JIRAs, >>>>> which >>>>> > includes interface changes >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1157 >>>>> > >>>>> > Because of the interface changes, the 2.0 release is not backward >>>>> > compatibility as per semantic versioning that Apache MADlib follows >>>>> > http://semver.org/ >>>>> > >>>>> > We have started a couple of wiki pages to discuss ideas for the new >>>>> 2.0 >>>>> > interface: >>>>> > >>>>> > Ideas >>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/Interface >>>>> +2.0+-+Ideas >>>>> > IO standardization >>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/Interface >>>>> +2.0+-+IO+ >>>>> > Standardization >>>>> > >>>>> > but it is not baked yet. So I am wondering if we ought to do a 1.13 >>>>> in Nov >>>>> > before Thanksgiving to give us more time to collectively make a plan >>>>> on the >>>>> > interface, which would go in 2.0 around Jan or so. >>>>> > >>>>> > Please let me know what you think, and also comment/add/subtract on >>>>> what’s >>>>> > proposed for the interface changes. >>>>> > >>>>> > Frank >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> *Ed Espino* >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Rashmi Raghu, Ph.D. >> Pivotal Data Science >> > >
