I believe your thought is correct although I don't think it's precise to assume any rounding. It may just be truncation for the purpose of displaying the values. You might want to look at the code that displays your output to see if you can increase the precision that's displayed.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:23 AM, rmx <ruimax...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > That is what I thought at first place. > But if you check the value of the 7th coordinate you will see that is > 0.000. > This made me very confuse. It seems that it is still not presenting the > results on a sparse way. > A justification maybe that the value of the 7th is not zero but it was > rounded to 0.000 in the output. > Someone can please confirm if my justification is correct? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/k-means-output-missing-some-cluster-centers-coordinates-tp1919928p1923072.html > Sent from the Mahout User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Have you thanked a teacher today? ---> http://www.liftateacher.org
