I've hit this (cant find math lib) before, too. Would love to see it be less "black magic" and more "just works". =)
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Jake Mannix <[email protected]> wrote: > wah. Even trying to do seq2sparse doesn't work for me: > > [jake@smf1-ady-15-sr1 mahout-distribution-0.5-SNAPSHOT]$ ./bin/mahout > seq2sparse -i hdfs://<namenode>/user/jake/text_temp -o > hdfs://<namenode>/user/jake/text_vectors_temp > Running on hadoop, using HADOOP_HOME=/usr/lib/hadoop-0.20 > No HADOOP_CONF_DIR set, using /usr/lib/hadoop-0.20/src/conf > 11/05/09 23:36:01 WARN driver.MahoutDriver: No seq2sparse.props found on > classpath, will use command-line arguments only > 11/05/09 23:36:01 INFO vectorizer.SparseVectorsFromSequenceFiles: Maximum > n-gram size is: 1 > 11/05/09 23:36:01 INFO vectorizer.SparseVectorsFromSequenceFiles: Minimum > LLR value: 1.0 > 11/05/09 23:36:01 INFO vectorizer.SparseVectorsFromSequenceFiles: Number of > reduce tasks: 1 > 11/05/09 23:36:04 INFO input.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : > 1 > 11/05/09 23:36:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: > job_201104300433_126621 > 11/05/09 23:36:12 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% > 11/05/09 23:36:47 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > attempt_201104300433_126621_m_000000_0, Status : FAILED > 11/05/09 23:37:07 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > attempt_201104300433_126621_m_000000_1, Status : FAILED > Error: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.lucene.analysis.Analyzer > > ---- > > Note I'm not specifying any fancy analyzer. Just trying to run with the > defaults. :\ > > -jake > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Jake Mannix <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I think I am still +1 to just creating one re-packaged .jar -- for now >>> at least. It fixes problems for sure. >>> And then I am happy for the cognoscenti to construct a better solution >>> later, and I'd be pleased to help. >>> Though I still don't find this re-packaging a bad thing -- theoretical >>> problems with signing keys and whatnot, yes, but don't exist in >>> practice now. >>> >>> I guess I'm asking whether anyone is for/against committing MAHOUT-691? >>> >> >> I think for our examples job jar, this is a good idea, for now. >> >> I will try out your patch and see how it looks on my production cluster. >> >> -jake >> > -- Twitter: @jpatanooga Solution Architect @ Cloudera hadoop: http://www.cloudera.com blog: http://jpatterson.floe.tv
